Future
Intramural Legend
- Messages
- 27,566
- Reaction score
- 14,714
You are grossly misrepresenting what I said and, no, I'm not wrong.You are wrong. I am reading, I just don't agree. There is a clear difference. Suggesting something that is an impossibility is not a solution. In fact, it's the exact opposite of that.
But I see your answer, you are saying that it is possible that Veteran players would vote for Rookies to get paid more then they, themselves can in their rookie years. That's what you are suggesting by saying "Yes, it is possible", just not right now, is that correct? Is that what you are saying? If it is, then we are in complete disagreement. That is never, ever going to happen. Please explain to me under what circumstances that vote happens.
Lastly, while I don't believe the cap is going anywhere, I agree with you that I would rather see the cap go away and teams go back to the way it was years ago but that, IMO, is not going to happen either. Chances are better of that IMO but it's just slightly more likely.
Yell if it makes you feel better but you are still wrong and it's not the fact that I am not listening. It's that you are simply incorrect and no matter how much INTERNET YELLING takes place, we will still be in the same place at the end of the day. It's not that I am not listing. It's the fact that I don't agree.
Yes, that is possible that the rookie cap goes away in the next CBA, but it is impractical and unlikely. Which I have maintained that rookie contract players' only course of action is a hold out. It's why I also said that Zeke holding out AND contributing to the next CBA do not have to be mutually exclusive. The circumstances it happens is when the crop of players who are right now grossly underpaid because they are on rookie deals chooses to put a stop to it, and veterans realize that they aren't getting a bigger share (see safeties and RBs). Is that likely, no, but it's not some ridiculous theory that you want it to be.