xwalker
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 57,011
- Reaction score
- 64,482
Dak #1 in QBR...
Rhat's why QBR is one of the best stats out there.
It understand that drops resulting in INTs are on the WR, and that an INT that drops your win % from 99.8% to 99.6%(eagles INT) shouldn't effect your stats like an INT while tied in the late 3rd quarter should.
Upon further review...the call on the field is confirmed...the poster does not know very much. DallasFann will not lose a time out...Lunchtime.
It shows that it's subjective, and therefore a fake "stat".
I mean...what I said is just a fact. :shrug:Some just refuse to better themselves. Whatever
Correct. It's about wins and titles.I would prefer to be 7-0.
I mean...what I said is just a fact. :shrug:
Exactly, it doesnt make senseI don't understand how a QBR which has Dak above Russel WIlson and Mahomes when they both have 15td's and 1INt can be a reliable metric when Dak has 12 and 7 and no other obvious advantage in any other category that I see.
As accurate as the present day officiating I see. Was the Man hunting fruitful at lunch too? Don't answer if your mouth is still full though. That would be bad manners
Dak's having a great year. This same metric had Dak rated at 17th last year but all you guys told me he was a lot better than that last year!Name a better stat
And no, calling it a fake stat is in fact not a fact at all. It's a real stat that is readily available.
Taking you while to reply? Shrugs
And y'all said he was a lot worse.Dak's having a great year. This same metric had Dak rated at 17th last year but all you guys told me he was a lot better than that last year!
So have the Patriots, yet I don't hear anyone complaining about Brady.and factoring that this team has played against the 24th, 26th, 29th and 31st ranked defenses when we played them. But what do I know
No, 17th about where I had him ranked last year! I would have actually put him at 15.And y'all said he was a lot worse.
So far through four years Dak has been top 5 in QBR three of those years, and after the Cooper trade he was top 7 in 2018.
We are getting quarterback production of a 6-1 or 7-0 team. Our QB would also prefer to be 7-0 and is doing his part.
It wasn’t a fake stat when Romo had a good rating tho. SMDH. Friggin LamesIt shows that it's subjective, and therefore a fake "stat".
Despite your hate for the formula being proprietary to ESPN, it is a far better measure of a QB's contribution to his team.You mean the "stat" espn made up?
.