Twitter: NFL passing leaders through week 7 (top 5 may surprise some)

[xwalker]

Dak #1 in QBR...

 

[Kevinicus]

Rhat's why QBR is one of the best stats out there.

It understand that drops resulting in INTs are on the WR, and that an INT that drops your win % from 99.8% to 99.6%(eagles INT) shouldn't effect your stats like an INT while tied in the late 3rd quarter should.

It shows that it's subjective, and therefore a fake "stat".

 

[shabazz]

Upon further review...the call on the field is confirmed...the poster does not know very much. DallasFann will not lose a time out...Lunchtime.

As accurate as the present day officiating I see. Was the Man hunting fruitful at lunch too? Don't answer if your mouth is still full though. That would be bad manners

 

[QuincyCarterEra]

It shows that it's subjective, and therefore a fake "stat".

Some just refuse to better themselves. Whatever

 

[Kevinicus]

Some just refuse to better themselves. Whatever

I mean...what I said is just a fact. :shrug:

 

[TexasHillbilly]

I would prefer to be 7-0.

Correct. It's about wins and titles.

 

[cowboyblue22]

the number on qb stat and team stat is wins and loses that's the only thing that gets u to the playoffs and a championship

 

[QuincyCarterEra]

I mean...what I said is just a fact. :shrug:

Name a better stat

And no, calling it a fake stat is in fact not a fact at all. It's a real stat that is readily available.

Taking you while to reply? Shrugs

 

[G2]

Prescott is playing at a top 5 level. It doesn't matter if other's are ahead of him, we were told he's nothing better than Alex Smith by some fans here who just can't seem to appreciate how he's helping the offense. We should all be thankful.

 

[jwitten82]

I don't understand how a QBR which has Dak above Russel WIlson and Mahomes when they both have 15td's and 1INt can be a reliable metric when Dak has 12 and 7 and no other obvious advantage in any other category that I see.

Exactly, it doesnt make sense

 

[Dallasfann]

As accurate as the present day officiating I see. Was the Man hunting fruitful at lunch too? Don't answer if your mouth is still full though. That would be bad manners

I actually want to apologize to you. I already bag n tagged you today. I'll give you a little running around room, but your leash is short. I don't want to see you digging up holes by the fence. Don't make me regret my decision to let you run around the back yard for a few hours. I'll be back home in a little bit. Do you need anything at the store while I'm gone?

 

[aikemirv]

Name a better stat

And no, calling it a fake stat is in fact not a fact at all. It's a real stat that is readily available.

Taking you while to reply? Shrugs

Dak's having a great year. This same metric had Dak rated at 17th last year but all you guys told me he was a lot better than that last year!

 

[QuincyCarterEra]

Dak's having a great year. This same metric had Dak rated at 17th last year but all you guys told me he was a lot better than that last year!

And y'all said he was a lot worse.

So far through four years Dak has been top 5 in QBR three of those years, and after the Cooper trade he was top 7 in 2018.

 

[America's Cowboy]

and factoring that this team has played against the 24th, 26th, 29th and 31st ranked defenses when we played them. But what do I know

So have the Patriots, yet I don't hear anyone complaining about Brady.

 

[aikemirv]

And y'all said he was a lot worse.

So far through four years Dak has been top 5 in QBR three of those years, and after the Cooper trade he was top 7 in 2018.

No, 17th about where I had him ranked last year! I would have actually put him at 15.

 

[Hawkeye0202]

 

[BigTimeBlues]

I'm really surprised (read: not really) that the likes of Ryan and Rivers are so high, being that their respective teams are not doing so hot..

Almost as if this is a team sport or something..crazy..

 

[keysersoze]

We are getting quarterback production of a 6-1 or 7-0 team. Our QB would also prefer to be 7-0 and is doing his part.

 

[keysersoze]

It shows that it's subjective, and therefore a fake "stat".

It wasn’t a fake stat when Romo had a good rating tho. SMDH. Friggin Lames

 

[JoeKing]

You mean the "stat" espn made up?
.

Despite your hate for the formula being proprietary to ESPN, it is a far better measure of a QB's contribution to his team.