Stash
Staff member
- Messages
- 78,417
- Reaction score
- 102,394
I agree on Garrett, but don't agree on Crawford and Heath.
Crawford was expensive with known health problems. That's why he should have been gone. I don't think he's as bad as you do, and we lacked alternatives. If he had been fully healthy, I would have kept him after seeing what we had in camp.
On Heath, his cost is minimal, and for it we get a full time starter *and* a half time special teams ace. He has played more snaps than anyone on the team. Heath is a value proposition.
Both guys are paid like starters and neither one is starting material. Crawford is grossly, sickly overpaid for a non-starter. And do we actually need to talk about how much better Quinn has been at RDE? Where Crawford was the 'starter'?