stilltheguru
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 14,713
- Reaction score
- 13,552
Do you know what direct evidence is? Clearly you dontYeah that is a source. Where is your source for your position?
Do you know what direct evidence is? Clearly you dontYeah that is a source. Where is your source for your position?
Do you know what direct evidence is? Clearly you dont
No one is interested in Garrett as a HC, except his stepdad, Jerry!! What a joke!!!It truly is a sad commentary on how far the talent level and professionalism in the NFL has fallen.
Why would any other franchise want to bring the circus that has become the Cowboys to their club?
Garrett has not shown the ability to make any franchise better.
He has shown that hundreds of millions of dollars in talent would be wasted under him.
If teams are serious about winning, I can't see them seriously being interested in Jason Garrett.
I wonder if Jerry is trying to hype interest in Garrett with this delay in order to make the last thirteen years not seem so farfetched.
So the answer is no, you dont know what it is.How cute. You think you can win a point of fact and so completely ignore the core argument. You have zero evidence for your position direct or otherwise.
Direct evidence means it speaks directly as proof of an argument or similar position and does not need inference or other support. Dilfer is a national football journalists with access to multiple NFL clubs. His position is both informed and expert. When he makes claims about what NFL clubs are saying it is direct evidence.
So the answer is no, you dont know what it is.
Post the official definitions of both and tell me based on the actual definiton how dilfers trash was direct evidence.it helps when you make such a claim that you give the definition that demonstrates your point. i would love to see you try and explain how my evidence is circumstantial.
I guess we all can't be as smart as you are.It truly isn’t. What it would be is a testament to how little fans understand about what goes into coaching an NFL team. As fans are, generally, largely clueless.
Post the official definitions of both and tell me based on the actual definiton how dilfers trash was direct evidence.
You brought it up so burden of proof will not be on me. Your definition was just that, your definition. Wasnt the legal definition. Try again.So now i have to prove your argument? Your claim, your burden of proof. You don't get presumption.
I already gave a definition and showed how it applied.
I guess we all can't be as smart as you are.
I don’t think any NFC East teams are laughing. If nothing else, he has dominated the division.
Many of you, no. But you guys do your best, which is cool, too.
I don’t think any NFC East teams are laughing. If nothing else, he has dominated the division.
Garrett is very competent at being mediocre.
He is completely incompetent at being Championship calibre.
One can be competent at checkers, but incompetent at chess. That's Garrett as a HC
LOL.
I suspect the NFCE teams would love to have Jerry continue to employee Garrett. Because for all his wins against the division, he has 3 divisional titles in 9 years and just collapsed and lost the division to an Eagles team that is completely ravaged by injuries.
And the people who operate them are called Jake Legs. lolFor those who don't know what a jack wagon is:
Jack wagon
n. Slang term derived from the Freight or Chow wagons used in the late 19th century. These were often the last wagons in a wagon train, making them the least favorable to drive due to the dust, waste, and debris from the front of the train.
When used as in insult it refers to one's lack of intelligence, implying the insultee is capable of no more than operating a Chow wagon."
The only time I heard this was in a GEICO commercial: Here, have a tissue, jack wagon. Jack wagon sums up Garrett in a nutshell.
And what sources do you have that he is garnering no interest? None nada zilch zero null.
We have a direct report from a national reporter that other teams like him. He is under contract for another 12 days. Do you understand the significance of that?
i haven't heard of even one request to interview Garrett from teams with an opening.