Does anyone know if we ever got an offer from the Bears?

Zekeats

theranchsucks
Messages
12,841
Reaction score
15,230
I'm pretty sure that would be the busiest thread here, if that had happened, so I'm gonna guess no
I feel like we had to of. If they moved up to 11 why wouldn't they at least inquire at 10 knowing also that Dallas is always a wild card. Don't you think they'd be worried about Dallas trading down with say NE and them losing there guy?
 

Flamma

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,084
Reaction score
18,863
In hindsight it would have been a mistake. Who would Dallas have picked? Barmore, Moehrig? I was all for it, I just didn't foresee both of those players dropping as far as they did. I thought they'd go sooner than their projection.

As it turns out, Dallas could have traded up for either of those two relatively cheap. I don't think they wanted either one.
 

Runwildboys

Confused about stuff
Messages
50,392
Reaction score
94,375
CowboysZone DIEHARD Fan
I feel like we had to of. If they moved up to 11 why wouldn't they at least inquire at 10 knowing also that Dallas is always a wild card. Don't you think they'd be worried about Dallas trading down with say NE and them losing there guy?
Maybe the Bears didn't think it would be worth the extra they'd have to give up for one more spot. Maybe they were working their way down the line until they found the first team willing to make a deal.
 

fivetwos

Well-Known Member
Messages
19,266
Reaction score
26,172
No we didn’t. It’s been reported we didn’t get that offer. I don’t know why people are still so upset about something that never was
Where did you see that?

Not saying it didn't happen, I must have missed it.
 

CashMan

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,536
Reaction score
1,162
In hindsight it would have been a mistake. Who would Dallas have picked? Barmore, Moehrig? I was all for it, I just didn't foresee both of those players dropping as far as they did. I thought they'd go sooner than their projection.

As it turns out, Dallas could have traded up for either of those two relatively cheap. I don't think they wanted either one.
Disagree. This is not a super bowl contender team IMO. I would of taken the 1st rd pick next year.
 

Stash

Staff member
Messages
78,373
Reaction score
102,312
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
In hindsight it would have been a mistake. Who would Dallas have picked? Barmore, Moehrig? I was all for it, I just didn't foresee both of those players dropping as far as they did. I thought they'd go sooner than their projection.

As it turns out, Dallas could have traded up for either of those two relatively cheap. I don't think they wanted either one.

In retrospect, that looks like the most likely scenario. When the corners went, Parsons was their top defensive player left. There was a big drop off after him on their boards.

They knew that they could still get one of Slater or Parsons if they dropped down two spots so they were willing to risk that. But dropping down to 20 means they’re both gone. And they likely weren’t willing to miss out on both
 

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
75,155
Reaction score
69,610
No we didn’t. It’s been reported we didn’t get that offer. I don’t know why people are still so upset about something that never was
Not only that but we are trying to win now. I don’t care about next years draft capital that’s Stephen Jones’s obsession. I’m not trading down to 20 in a top heavy draft. It’s silly.

I think it’s funny some people hate the draft but wanted them to take that trade.
 

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
75,155
Reaction score
69,610
In retrospect, that looks like the most likely scenario. When the corners went, Parsons was their top defensive player left. There was a big drop off after him on their boards.

They knew that they could still get one of Slater or Parsons if they dropped down two spots so they were willing to risk that. But dropping down to 20 means they’re both gone. And they likely weren’t willing to miss out on both

Exactly. And I also dont like this organization trading away from talent. It worked one time with Fredericks.....Never get too cute and honestly I don’t know why the Giants took the deal. I would’ve taken Fields or Slater if I were them. The trade down worked somewhat for them because they still got a very good receiver but I’m not even sure what their insistence was at getting a receiver anyway.
 

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
75,155
Reaction score
69,610
Disagree. This is not a super bowl contender team IMO. I would of taken the 1st rd pick next year.
That may be how you feel but as of right now every team thinks they are a contender at this point in the season. There’s no process like Jason Garrett use to spoon feed you. You can go from bad to good if you make the correct moves in your offseason.
 

Stash

Staff member
Messages
78,373
Reaction score
102,312
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Exactly. And I also dont like this organization trading away from talent. It worked one time with Fredericks.....Never get too cute and honestly I don’t know why the Giants took the deal. I would’ve taken Fields or Slater if I were them. The trade down worked somewhat for them because they still got a very good receiver but I’m not even sure what their insistence was at getting a receiver anyway.

I think the Eagles got the Giants in that trade up. They hoped to get Smith, and when Philly moved up and grabbed him, there wasn’t anyone they loved more than getting that additional 1st rounder next year. They had their quarterback and left tackle drafted the two years prior.
 

Stash

Staff member
Messages
78,373
Reaction score
102,312
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
That may be how you feel but as of right now every team thinks they are a contender at this point in the season. There’s no process like Jason Garrett use to spoon feed you. You can go from bad to good if you make the correct moves in your offseason.

This team always feels that they’re contenders.
 

Flamma

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,084
Reaction score
18,863
Exactly. And I also dont like this organization trading away from talent. It worked one time with Fredericks.....Never get too cute and honestly I don’t know why the Giants took the deal. I would’ve taken Fields or Slater if I were them. The trade down worked somewhat for them because they still got a very good receiver but I’m not even sure what their insistence was at getting a receiver anyway.

Only one reason I can think of. They want to give QB Jones every opportunity to succeed. Then make a decision on whether or not to extend him after 2021. They could have done that with Slater. But I guess they rather have the 1st next year and the WR. But the Cowboys need all the help they can get. That trade would have sucked for us.
 

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
75,155
Reaction score
69,610
I think the Eagles got the Giants in that trade up. They hoped to get Smith, and when Philly moved up and grabbed him, there wasn’t anyone they loved more than getting that additional 1st rounder next year. They had their quarterback and left tackle drafted the two years prior.
I agree and they know better than me I’m not gonna sit here and say what they should’ve done but to me if they need offensive line help they could’ve plugged Slater at guard or tackle. And Daniel Jones is tricky. I can get not getting Fields....if they still believe in Jones. They clearly do and are about to give him and Garrett another year together. Yikes....
 
Top