For All You "Dak Sucks" Posters. Did Yall Watch Tribiskey

Philmonroe · Sep 6, 2019

Beast_from_East said:
26/45 208 yards 1 pick 62.1 Rating

Yeah, he is light years better than Dak...……...Haaaaaaaaabaaaaaaaaaaaaa

What type of online stupid logic is this? Where are the posters saying Mitch is better than Dak? I mean at best you might have 1% of this board saying that if that. Y’all Dak lovers need to get it together smh. Lastly Mitch don’t play for us so I don’t give a dang how bad he is unlike Smith Jr who does

GoJacks · Sep 6, 2019

TheSkaven said:
When the Bears we’re down 10-3 with less than two minutes in the game and backed up inside their own 20, you knew the game was lost for the Bears.

But even the Dak haters have to admit, you put the Cowboys and Dak in that same situation, and you can feel reasonably confident that he’ll drive the team down the field and tie the game.

Dak is clutch. There’s a reason he’s one of the league leaders in game-winning drives. It has been a long time since I knew that I could trust the ball in our QB’s hands when the game is on the line late in the 4th quarter.

Now go get him signed, Jerry!

And much of that has to do with the offense he has around him.

Miller · Sep 6, 2019

AsthmaField said:
He was awful. Like really bad.

Chicago would have won that game if they had a semblance of offense.

Allen Robinson would have had 300 yards. Guy was open all game and no one could throw to him and he still had 107

Kevinicus · Sep 6, 2019

Nav22 said:
“Average QBs are not”

Average STARTING QBs? Um, yeah, actually they are pretty freaking hard to find.

You can plug a RB in and get decent production FAR more often than you can plug a QB in and get decent production.

Literally every year there are a handful of RBs who “came out of nowhere” to produce and produce well. That’s why nobody would’ve been surprised to see Tony Pollard rush for 1,000+ yards had Zeke held out.

The odds of another 4th-round QB performing like Dak Prescott has? Winning 2/3 of his games while being a dual scoring threat with a 96.0 passer rating?

Yeah, good luck with that. That almost NEVER happens.

LOL good QBs aren’t “that difficult” to find though! 2/3 of the league can’t find one to save their lives, but it’s not “that difficult”!!!

Ridiculous.

Average Starting QBs account for about 1/2 the starting QBs in the league. Then you have quite a few average QBs accounted for in the backups in the league.

There are simply far more RBs in the league, far more are drafted, far more get a chance to play. It's a numbers thing, not a difficulty finding thing.

What does "good" have to do with Dak? Why ignore my question about Freeman? Why ignore my question about you going off on tangents? Was your point in engaging with me to argue some strawman about 4th round QBs?

What does ANY of this have to do with Dak throwing 40 times in a game and the team scoring zero points?

Nav22 · Sep 6, 2019

Kevinicus said:
Average Starting QBs account for about 1/2 the starting QBs in the league. Then you have quite a few average QBs accounted for in the backups in the league.

There are simply far more RBs in the league, far more are drafted, far more get a chance to play. It's a numbers thing, not a difficulty finding thing.

What does "good" have to do with Dak? Why ignore my question about Freeman? Why ignore my question about you going off on tangents? Was your point in engaging with me to argue some strawman about 4th round QBs?

What does ANY of this have to do with Dak throwing 40 times in a game and the team scoring zero points?

What does your point about Freeman have to do with anything?

Yes, Freeman has been a steal in the 4th round. So what? The importance of a RB isn’t even close to that of a QB, hence the differences in pay.

Dak’s play over the last 3 years, overall, has absolutely been “good”. Any imbecile with a shred of a football IQ could tell you that. That’s what “good” has to do with Dak.

I love how hung up you are on 1 game. Psst... he’s 32-16 over 3 years with very good numbers. You’re done here.

LOL I’m the one who went off on a tangent? Not you? Was this thread more about Dak’s worth as a QB or Dak’s play in 1 game vs the Colts last season?

atlantacowboy · Sep 6, 2019

Offense is always harder to play than defense. More timing and structure involved. What we saw last night were 2 great defenses. It usually takes a few weeks for offenses to get the rust out anyway , since nobody plays in preseason anymore.

Portnoy1 · Sep 6, 2019

PAPPYDOG said:
Those numbers are Dak Numbers pretty much week in week out!
Dak has 17 games in 3 seasons for under 200 yards what the heck are you celebrating about?
Crazy ....

Does he throw that many times to get to 200 though?

lwehlers · Sep 6, 2019

I do not understand why the bears did not play tribiskey at all in the preseason. guy like him needs to play in preseason. I like the fact that Prescott played in atleast two series in each game. even tom brady plays in preseason games.

Kevinicus · Sep 6, 2019

Nav22 said:
What does your point about Freeman have to do with anything?

Yes, Freeman has been a steal in the 4th round. So what? The importance of a RB isn’t even close to that of a QB, hence the differences in pay.

The sure sign of poor logic is when you apply it elsewhere and it completely blow up what you are saying. You asked how many QBs were drafted in the first 4 rounds and how many were better than Dak. I used that same question with the RB position. It was used to show that it's not unique to QBs. The rate of success is pretty similar. And it all goes to your silly argument about draft position in the first place. Mitch was a high pick who struggled (in one game, they were basically the same overall last year). Somehow, that single point of evidence proves QBs are hard to find. Yet, also at the same time, the single point of evidence of Dak (who you claim is good) being taken in the 4th doesn't counter that point. Your logic is inconsistent.

Dak’s play over the last 3 years, overall, has absolutely been “good”. Any imbecile with a shred of a football IQ could tell you that. That’s what “good” has to do with Dak.

False.

I love how hung up you are on 1 game. Psst... he’s 32-16 over 3 years with very good numbers. You’re done here.

Hung up on one game? This is sad and pathetic and a sign of troll. Someone claimed what happened with Mitch last night NEVER happened with Dak. I pointed to a game that it not only did happen (unless you want to be an idiot and split hairs over 39 vs. 40 attempts), it was actually worse. This thread is all about ONE GAME. I'm not hung up on it, I'm staying within the conversation, something you seem completely incapable of doing.

LOL I’m the one who went off on a tangent? Not you? Was this thread more about Dak’s worth as a QB or Dak’s play in 1 game vs the Colts last season?

I would be embarrassed for you, but you don't even deserve that much. If you can't read, I can't help you.

Maybe you just need glasses, can you read this (what my comment was in regards to, and which was clearly quoted when you responded)?

Dak has never backed up and thrown the ball 40 times and had DAL score 3 points or less. EVER.
That was tragic.

zerofill · Sep 6, 2019

GMO415 said:
That average QB has the most 4th quarter come backs than every QB in the league.....yeah Dak sounds sooo average

Yeah the same argument was made for Romo, all the time. Which I really liked Romo. But, the problem is... you shouldn't need to be rated as the QB with the most 4th quarter come backs, period.

Not to mention, stats are only a very small portion of the things you can (and should) use to evaluate a player's performance. Stats in the NFL give a very very skewed view of a player.
The only factual reference you can really have, is watching them play. When I watch Dak play, I see:

1) Someone who wants to win
2) Someone who wants to be a leader
3) Someone who likes the guys around him
4) Someone who is easy to get along with
5) Someone who loves football
6) Someone who has great durability

Just because you have all that, doesn't mean you are an above average QB, or player in general.

Nav22 · Sep 6, 2019

Kevinicus said:
The sure sign of poor logic is when you apply it elsewhere and it completely blow up what you are saying. You asked how many QBs were drafted in the first 4 rounds and how many were better than Dak. I used that same question with the RB position. It was used to show that it's not unique to QBs. The rate of success is pretty similar. And it all goes to your silly argument about draft position in the first place. Mitch was a high pick who struggled (in one game, they were basically the same overall last year). Somehow, that single point of evidence proves QBs are hard to find. Yet, also at the same time, the single point of evidence of Dak (who you claim is good) being taken in the 4th doesn't counter that point. Your logic is inconsistent.

False.

Hung up on one game? This is sad and pathetic and a sign of troll. Someone claimed what happened with Mitch last night NEVER happened with Dak. I pointed to a game that it not only did happen (unless you want to be an idiot and split hairs over 39 vs. 40 attempts), it was actually worse. This thread is all about ONE GAME. I'm not hung up on it, I'm staying within the conversation, something you seem completely incapable of doing.

I would be embarrassed for you, but you don't even deserve that much. If you can't read, I can't help you.

Maybe you just need glasses, can you read this (what my comment was in regards to, and which was clearly quoted when you responded)?

LOL I didn’t go through the entire thread to find the exact context of your post, no.

I saw what you posted and responded to it. I love how offended you are by that.

LOL Dak hasn’t been “good”, right. He has outperformed Carson Wentz, who just got $32 mil/year. I look forward to Dak’s extension, when you’ll surely be furrowing your brow in a vain attempt to understand football.

landryscorner · Sep 6, 2019

Just to end this thread once and for all DAK SUCKS.

Kevinicus · Sep 6, 2019

Nav22 said:
LOL I didn’t go through the entire thread to find the exact context of your post, no.

I saw what you posted and responded to it. I love how offended you are by that.

LOL Dak hasn’t been “good”, right. He has outperformed Carson Wentz, who just got $32 mil/year. I look forward to Dak’s extension, when you’ll surely be furrowing your brow in a vain attempt to understand football.

Lol, the whole thread? Go away troll. It was right there in my first post that you responded to.

And false. He has not outplayed Wentz.

blumayne38 · Sep 6, 2019

Beast_from_East said:
26/45 208 yards 1 pick 62.1 Rating

Yeah, he is light years better than Dak...……...Haaaaaaaaabaaaaaaaaaaaaa

Dak could have a similar game, and fans would defend him. Binski didnt do well but no need for bears fans to overreact.

CB61 · Sep 6, 2019

Beast_from_East said:
26/45 208 yards 1 pick 62.1 Rating

Yeah, he is light years better than Dak...……...Haaaaaaaaabaaaaaaaaaaaaa

Yeah that was a horrifg outing by him

Melonfeud · Sep 6, 2019

Nav22 said:
B-b-b-but we should get rid of Dak so we can tank and select our savior high in the draft, like Chicago did DURRRR!!!!

Dak has no “arm talent” compared to a top pick like Trubisky DURRRR!!!

Trubisky would go 40-8 over 3 years in Dallas because Dak sux DUUUURRRRRR!!!!!!!!!!!!

WHAT!?!? The actual RESULTS are what matter?!?!?! WHO SAYS!?!?! DURRRR!!!!!

LMAO

*and that whole "!?!?!?!?",,, er,,,? Is an astoundingly effective visual conveyance ,being utilized in illustrating one's befuddled puzzlement ,,, :thumbup:

erod · Sep 6, 2019

jterrell said:
Dak was 19 of 29 and had a 81QBR that game. He had more yards and a higher COMP % than Cam.
Thus his point... that you goofballs can't wrap your head around.
Dak's worst games are far better than that.

Dak has never backed up and thrown the ball 40 times and had DAL score 3 points or less. EVER.
That was tragic.

And he had 0 points halfway through the fourth quarter.

Proof that stats mean almost nothing.

QT · Sep 6, 2019

Out of all of Dak's comeback wins, how many of those are b/c he couldn't do anything the first 3 qtrs and the Dallas D keeping him in the game?

About to overpay for an mediocre QB that will handicap this franchise for a long time.

Melonfeud · Sep 6, 2019

PAPPYDOG said:
Why do you bother with me then?
I'm not worthy of someone of your stature and education.
No scoot along problem child and GL

* ya know there, PappyD?
Employing my patently proven verbiaged usage of "yer' " & " yer's" in it's stead, over the king's approved by it's royally decreed proper vernacular, is the perfect countermeasure to them there grammarian ***** prose troopers ,,,yessir, as they steer clear by a wide birth, this here independent realm of "Backfourty-ville",,,

jnday · Sep 6, 2019

Nav22 said:
“Average QBs are not”

Average STARTING QBs? Um, yeah, actually they are pretty freaking hard to find.

You can plug a RB in and get decent production FAR more often than you can plug a QB in and get decent production.

Literally every year there are a handful of RBs who “came out of nowhere” to produce and produce well. That’s why nobody would’ve been surprised to see Tony Pollard rush for 1,000+ yards had Zeke held out.

The odds of another 4th-round QB performing like Dak Prescott has? Winning 2/3 of his games while being a dual scoring threat with a 96.0 passer rating?

Yeah, good luck with that. That almost NEVER happens.

LOL good QBs aren’t “that difficult” to find though! 2/3 of the league can’t find one to save their lives, but it’s not “that difficult”!!!

Ridiculous.

2/3rds of the league can’t find one and that includes Dallas. The need to settle for a QB that will never be anything but average at best is strong with you. For all or your arrogance and self righteous BS, you cling to average. That says so much about your great football intellect that you claim to have. Yeah, jump for joy for settling with average. It fits you well.

For All You "Dak Sucks" Posters. Did Yall Watch Tribiskey

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

ARTIST FORMERLY KNOWN AS TEXASFROG

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

I Copy!,,, er,,,I guess,,,ah,,,maybe.

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

I Copy!,,, er,,,I guess,,,ah,,,maybe.

Well-Known Member