Dak was great tonight

mattjames2010 · Nov 10, 2019

stiletto said:
I'm pretty sure by your standards we've never had a real franchise QB. Roger Staubach, I got news for you, had many games just like Dak himself.....Start slow, play awesome in the second half, etc. MANY GAMES like that and sometimes he didnt win. Was he not a franchise QB either? I guess all is forgiven if the QB wins a Super Bowl, but until then, good gawd, he has a couple bad first quarters, he's not a franchise QB.. wahhhhhh!

*sigh*

THE ARGUMENT ISN’T THAT IT NEVER HAPPENS YOU NERD! THE ARGUMENT IS THAT IT IS A TREND WITH DAK! IS THE ALL-CAPS WORKING FOR YOU, FELLA?

Read that twice. Think. Read it twice again. Think harder unless you start to get a headache...

GB
NO
NYJ
Minny

All games we started slow in, all games with Dak as our QB, all games we took an L.

Sheesh

DallasInDC · Nov 10, 2019

WillieBeamen said:
Look at this FOOL yall

Where in any of my posts tonight said he is THE problem with this team?

Answer, coward

... Your shtick is lame...

mattjames2010 · Nov 10, 2019

AmariChill said:
I can’t believe there are actually people in this thread scavenging reasons to blame Dak. He did ABSOLUTELY NOTHING wrong tonight. This loss is 100% of defense and coaching. If you blame Dak for even 1% of this loss, you’re a dumb a-s that can’t be helped.

> absolutely nothing wrong

These are the exaggerations that are being criticized

HungryLion · Nov 10, 2019

WillieBeamen said:
LOL

so he brings up a great rebuttal, but now you dont care

Typical

It’s a dumb argument. A dumb rebuttal. “The Vikings were daring Dak to beat them and he only put up 400 yards and 3 TD’s”.

you know how stupid that sounds??

America's Cowboy · Nov 10, 2019

mattjames2010 said:
Who is to blame for the continuous slow starts? Lack of audibles?

Also, we just took an L and the first thought you had was to make a thread excusing a player that was part of the loss.

I’m wondering why this team can’t beat winning teams under our supposed franchise QB. 24 points is not enough to win in today’s game consistently.

Get lost moron. You know very well Dak carried the team and was not to blame for th

mattjames2010 said:
Nobody suggested it was only Dak. So the argument is moot, nor did I say a QB “always” has to. Again, you people are adding arguments not being made.

Dak is part of the problem with our slow starts. That is what I said and I mentioned the pattern.

How is Dak a problem during the slow start tonight? Break down the plays and prove your point that Dak is part of the problem.

Philmonroe · Nov 10, 2019

CowboysBravesSpurs said:
What’s the point of this thread? We lose and you immediately go to post about Dak? Lol what?

Anyone with a brain could see it wasn’t on Dak. Dak played great. Not sure why weirdos are so quick to talk about Dak instead of our piss poor o-line and defense.

They're male groupies that lives revolve around defending Daks honor online. Straight weirdo status.

Chrispierce · Nov 10, 2019

I think anyone who’s honest ...we saw a real franchise QB moment tonight. We were dead by all rights...Zeke couldn’t run,and Dak put on a passing show down the stretch. That’s big league stuff. Horribly disappointing loss,but good to know we got a guy who can go toe to toe down in a hole.

MysteryIceGuro · Nov 10, 2019

America's Cowboy said:
Get lost moron. You know very well Dak carried the team and was not to blame for th

How is Dak a problem during the slow start tonight? Break down the plays and prove your point that Dak is part of the problem.

He won’t be able to. I can’t believe there are people stupid enough on this forum to blame Dak for anything bad that happened tonight.

Runwildboys · Nov 10, 2019

khiladi said:
Teams defend the Rams and Goff more in cover 2 than they do Dak..

Because the Rams don't have Zeke. I'm not a Dakophant, brother, I'm just calling it like it is. Dak played a very good game, regardless of what coverage the defense used. He was putting the ball where it needed to be, and extending plays at times to do it. Some of those throws couldn't have been defended if there was triple coverage, because the DB would've had to be out of bounds to do it.

stiletto · Nov 10, 2019

mattjames2010 said:
*sigh*

THE ARGUMENT ISN’T THAT IT NEVER HAPPENS YOU NERD! THE ARGUMENT IS THAT IT IS A TREND WITH DAK! IS THE ALL-CAPS WORKING FOR YOU, FELLA?

Read that twice. Think. Read it twice again. Think harder unless you start to get a headache...

GB
NO
NYJ
Minny

All games we started slow in, all games with Dak as our QB, all games we took an L.

Sheesh

Ok, lets throw Dak away because of 4 games. Good idea, genius. I'm sure play calling by the new O Coordinator has had nothing to do with it, "Nope..nope...ALL DAK's fault... Wahhhhhhh! Let's get rid of him! Wahhhhh..." This is what you sound like.....for 4 games, that sample makes you not want to pay Dak? Glad you aren't running the team. Good reason you are on the forum just like the rest of us cause you don't know crap either. LOL

khiladi · Nov 10, 2019

DakPresgoat said:
Ignore the horrific performance by our defense and running game.......

I thought I made that clear in my post. Our passing game did what it was supposed to do. The rest of the team didn’t. Don’t play semantics now.

False argument. I never ignored them.

I do know the Vikings pretty much brought a man in the box all game long and Cooper and Gallup pretty much had one man to beat, including a young corner all night long.

And Dak basically failed at the end.

Its comical. Back when Dak was playing like trash for three quarters, it was all about his he ended the game. Now when “Clutch” ends the game like that, “oh but he did this and that”..

America's Cowboy · Nov 10, 2019

AmariChill said:
He won’t be able to. I can’t believe there are people stupid enough on this forum to blame Dak for anything bad that happened tonight.

They are the handful of Romosexuals who still hate Dak because Dak forced Romo to retire.

mattjames2010 · Nov 10, 2019

America's Cowboy said:
Get lost moron. You know very well Dak carried the team and was not to blame for th

How is Dak a problem during the slow start tonight? Break down the plays and prove your point that Dak is part of the problem.

Are you trying to suggest that Dak wasn’t off target in the first quarter?

Are you ignoring in previous games this year where we started slow, Dak was not only having problems throwing the ball behind receivers, but too high which was leading to turnovers?

Also, either you want me to make an argument or to “get lost” - which is it? Make up your mind.

WillieBeamen · Nov 10, 2019

DakPresgoat said:
It’s a dumb argument. A dumb rebuttal. “The Vikings were daring Dak to beat them and he only put up 400 yards and 3 TD’s”.

you know how stupid that sounds??

It was a GREAT rebuttal

you played the what if/blame game when it came to Witten dropping that pass.

he brought up the dropped pick 6, and then you say You dont care what he has to say? Lmao

ICP · Nov 10, 2019

Yes he was but not great enough to overcome the coaching

stiletto · Nov 10, 2019

America's Cowboy said:
How is Dak a problem during the slow start tonight? Break down the plays and prove your point that Dak is part of the problem.

Don't even bother, this guy is one of the Short-Bus riders of the forum. LOL

trickblue · Nov 10, 2019

WillieBeamen said:
Man who the hell cares

Team lost and probably wont make the playoffs

B b but our overrated QB looked good tho!!

"Overrated"...

mattjames2010 · Nov 10, 2019

America's Cowboy said:
They are the handful of Romosexuals who still hate Dak because Dak forced Romo to retire.

Nobody brought up Romo. Take it to another zone and stop detailing with baseless accusations.

I don’t care about Romo.

khiladi · Nov 10, 2019

Runwildboys said:
Because the Rams don't have Zeke. I'm not a Dakophant, brother, I'm just calling it like it is. Dak played a very good game, regardless of what coverage the defense used. He was putting the ball where it needed to be, and extending plays at times to do it. Some of those throws couldn't have been defended if there was triple coverage, because the DB would've had to be out of bounds to do it.

When people are trying to prop up Dak while tearing down Zeke and the defense than it’s an issue. There whole objective is to try and project Dak like he’s elite.

he’s not.

and the Rams gave Gurley who was rushing fit six yards a carry, but the Rams ran him 12 times that game and has Goff throw forty.

America's Cowboy · Nov 10, 2019

mattjames2010 said:
Are you trying to suggest that Dak wasn’t off target in the first quarter?

Are you ignoring in previous games this year where we started slow, Dak was not only having problems throwing the ball behind receivers, but too high which was leading to turnovers?

Also, either you want me to make an argument or to “get lost” - which is it? Make up your mind.

When was Dak off during tonight's game?

Dak was great tonight

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Confused about stuff

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

BoysfanfromNY

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Not Old School...Old Testament...

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member