firehawk350;2790490 said:
Does the term grain of salt mean anything to you?
if it weren't a great judge of defensive talent whose seen and coached a player, yeah, I would take it w/ a grain of salt
firehawk said:
You had a ridiculous premise. Just because Wade picked him doesn’t make them contributors. Your scouting consists of, “if Wade got him, he’s good” which is absolutely insane in any form of a debate.
my premise is that we'll once again have a fearsome pass-rushing group
out of 3 players, we should find one who can rush the passer to help Ware, and Ware's mere presence is going to help that happen since Spencer will be seeing less attention
firehawk said:
You shoot the gap which leaves the OTHER gap open. Sure, you can stop the run in the backfield, but if the RB is hitting the hole you just vacated and does so faster than you can beat your blocker, you will give up a HUGE run.
5 linemen, that means there are 4 gaps, the LDE plugs the gap between the RT and the RG, the RDE plugs the gap between the LT and the LG, and the NT takes on the C and one of the OGs
that leaves one gap that needs to be plugged by the strong-side, inside LB
there is no vacating gaps, even when you go through them, you're still responsible for that area, the single-gap just means there is a greater chance of the linemen making the play than the LBs, than if it were a double-gap scheme
firehawk said:
That’s what happened against Baltimore. Spencer shot the gap outside either the guard or tackle (I forget which one) and the B-more RB hit the inside gap. This effectively took Spencer out of the play. All b-more had to do was making a crashing safety miss (not overly difficult) and it was gravy. A 2-gap would have likely stopped that run by allowing Spencer to make a play on the RB. Even if he didn’t get the tackle, he would have stopped momentum and allowed Hamlin to get a better angle.
that's not what happened, Spencer was supposed to take on a block, he ran around it, taking himself out of the play and leaving a blocker to take on someone else
firehawk said:
You have a sense that can see the future? Really?
I meant common sense
but of course you would like Dallas to continue using an offensive scheme that isn't successful, and which nearly got Romo killed