casmith07
Attorney-at-Zone
- Messages
- 31,538
- Reaction score
- 9,312
kristie;4567241 said:how many years are left on his contract?
He had a player option which voided with the trade, so he has 1 year left.
kristie;4567241 said:how many years are left on his contract?
Cowboys&LakersFan;4567272 said:I don't know why, but I have a feeling the Lakers are gonna win the next two games, but lose game 7.
juck;4567447 said:Clippers needs a shooter. Blake was left wide open constantly and wouldnt shoot and when he did he sucked. lol. Well at least we will have a good WCF with OKC and Spurs.
casmith07;4567461 said:Nobody else knows why either. The Lakers are sunk.
Kangaroo;4567717 said:If the Clipers keep Paul and Griffin together an add some solid pieces around them they can very well challenge the OKC as the new hot young teams of the future in the WC to battle it out.
I think they need to keep Bledsoe he played hard and was feisty on both ends of the court and can score they need to add some shooters and Griffin needs to work on the art of the Bank Shot
EMMITTnROY;4567879 said:I think it's hilarious that Cowboys&LakersFan keeps acting like the Lakers should be up 3-1. OKC killed LA in game 1. In game 2, OKC was up at halftime, and the Lakers didn't get their biggest lead until 2 minutes left in the game, at which point, the Thunder took over. So it's silly to say that OKC "stole" that game. In game 3, OKC thoroughly outplayed the Lakers, but in one of the most lopsided officiated games I've ever seen, the Lakers were bailed out with 42 free throw attempts, of which they hit an incredible 41. In game 4, the game was played about evenly if you take away the Lakers' free throw advantage again, but then the Thunder closed again, and the Lakers did not.
The Thunder could have easily swept your Lakers had your boys not got every single foul called your way in Game 3. I wouldn't have brought any of this up if it wasn't for you pretending like the Lakers have outplayed OKC. Look at the stats. OKC is killing you just about any way you slice it. The Lakers are one of the most storied franchises in pro sports, and Kobe is an all-time player, but I'd like some Lakers fan to just admit that the Thunder is simply better than they are now.
Like I said, the Thunder were up by 3 at halftime and the Lakers didn't get their biggest lead until 2 minutes left in the game. It was back and forth until that point. So to act like the Lakers had outplayed them is silly. The Lakers went on a little run to get their big lead, and then the Thunder closed with an even better run to win it. The Thunder shot 42% for the game, and the Lakers shot 38% for the game. For this game, the free throws were even, as were the turnovers. Lakers had a slight edge in rebounds, while OKC had a slight edge in assists. OKC had a huge edge in blocked shots. Please convince me that the Lakers outplayed OKC this game. Here's the box score: http://scores.espn.go.com/nba/boxscore?gameId=320516025Cowboys&LakersFan;4567899 said:What's so hilarious it's true? Lakers had a 7 point lead with 2 minutes to play in game 2
The Lakers didn't give it away, the Thunder took it. They could not stop Russell Westbrook and KD in the end, period. And the Thunder started playing with much more intensity in the 4th quarter. Do you not realize that games last 48 minutes, and the best teams play the best in the 4th? In this game, the Thunder shot 49.4% and the Lakers shot 43%. Here's the box score: http://www.nba.com/games/20120519/OKCLAL/gameinfo.htmlCowboys&LakersFan;4567899 said:and a 13 point lead in the 4th quarter of game 4 and they simply gave it away. The Lakers have clearly been the better team in 3 of the 4 games and should be up 3-1.
Hahaha!! Wow, just wow. A Lakers fan saying this is just precious. I hate to just obliterate all your arguments with facts, but here goes: for the series, the Lakers have shot 100 free throws, the Thunder have shot 98. The only game that was lopsided in the Thunder's favor was game 1, when the Lakers got frustrated and started fouling a ton when the game was getting out of hand. The only game that has been called out for poor officiating was game 3, in which Kobe shot 18 free throws. The Lakers scored 49 points off of 11 made baskets in the second half because they kept calling phantom fouls, especially on James Harden. Give me a break.Cowboys&LakersFan;4567899 said:Also LOL at you complaining about officiating. Hypocrisy at its finest. You can't even breathe on OKC without getting called for a foul.
Thank you for bringing some sanity to this discussion.MC KAos;4567986 said:the thunder is the better team, thats a fact. only people that dont see that are lakers fans
EMMITTnROY;4567879 said:I think it's hilarious that Cowboys&LakersFan keeps acting like the Lakers should be up 3-1. OKC killed LA in game 1. In game 2, OKC was up at halftime, and the Lakers didn't get their biggest lead until 2 minutes left in the game, at which point, the Thunder took over. So it's silly to say that OKC "stole" that game. In game 3, OKC thoroughly outplayed the Lakers, but in one of the most lopsided officiated games I've ever seen, the Lakers were bailed out with 42 free throw attempts, of which they hit an incredible 41. In game 4, the game was played about evenly if you take away the Lakers' free throw advantage again, but then the Thunder closed again, and the Lakers did not.
The Thunder could have easily swept your Lakers had your boys not got every single foul called your way in Game 3. I wouldn't have brought any of this up if it wasn't for you pretending like the Lakers have outplayed OKC. Look at the stats. OKC is killing you just about any way you slice it. The Lakers are one of the most storied franchises in pro sports, and Kobe is an all-time player, but I'd like some Lakers fan to just admit that the Thunder is simply better than they are now.
With as close as three of the games have been, I'm fine with 3-1. But my point remains valid, had the Lakers not been gifted 42 free throws in Game 3, the Thunder would have been up 3-0. Pretty reasonable to think that they would/could have won Game 4, not only because they actually did, but because being down 3-0 would have pretty much been the knockout blow.Tricericon;4568035 said:No offense man, but as silly as "Lakers should be up 3-1" is, saying they'd have been swept except for the officiating is even more silly. The Thunder have outplayed the Lakers so far, but not so much that they got to 3-1 without catching the larger share of the breaks too. They'd have had to be extremely fortunate to get the sweep without playing much better than they did in games 2-4.
Tricericon;4568035 said:No offense man, but as silly as "Lakers should be up 3-1" is, saying they'd have been swept except for the officiating is even more silly. The Thunder have outplayed the Lakers so far, but not so much that they got to 3-1 without catching the larger share of the breaks too. They'd have had to be extremely fortunate to get the sweep without playing much better than they did in games 2-4.