Doomsday
Rising Star
- Messages
- 20,225
- Reaction score
- 16,868
We won w Carter. Not pretty but we won more than we lost w him.
Other than the whole drug addict thing he was great.
We won w Carter. Not pretty but we won more than we lost w him.
Wentz goes 1. Goff goes 2. Prescott goes in the 5th round.
The Chiefs game really turned my head around watching Tyreek Hill. Im on board with that the next draftI actually think Dak will continue to improve as a passer, especially if we ever land a true speedy deep threat.
will anything ever top 1983?
Elway, Kelly, Marino and Babe Laufenberg.
Deep threats are overrated
He needs a 110 catch, 1500 yard receiver
Wentz is a more polished passer than Dak and has pretty good deep ball. Dak is very good at running his offense, he needs to improve his down the field passing to reach the next level.
I take Dak but most are infatuated with how good Wentz looks. Because he's big with a arm and decent athleticism.Here's a good question.
In a re-draft with every team with hindsight, which QB gets selected first from the 2016 draft?
I still take Dak.
Wentz has a beautiful long ball
Dak has the determination
We won w Carter. Not pretty but we won more than we lost w him.
Is Tom Brady better than Peyton Manning?
Q ruined himself with bad decisions under the wrong coach to tempt.
IMO, he wasn't all that bad and was looking like he could take the next step before his final screw up. In fact, that Cowboys team in totality was so lousy he might have been the most dangerous offensive player on the squad. That is not hyperbole.
I'm not usually a super draftnik. But because the Cowboys were going to draft a quarterback, I watched a lot of tape that offseason. On film, Wentz looked amazing. It wasn't just that he threw a great ball. It's that he knew where to put it - over the outside shoulder, low away from the defender, etc. And he ran like a halfback, low and shifty. I thought we should have moved mountains to draft him. But I doubt even Risen Star would have said he'd be MVP by year 2.
Goff appeared to be the most pro-ready, but a year of Jeff Fisher can change that. He always knew where to place the ball to let the receiver make more yardage. That's what really stood out.
I didn't love Dak's tape. But I tried to temper my disappointment with the Cowboys' fascination because he scored really well on an analytics test that had predicted Russell Wilson's success. If there was a guy that you were going to take in a later round, that made him the right choice.
I didn't like Paxton Lynch. Too many short passes to too many wide open receivers. His one game against a good team (Miss. St.) showed that he didn't have the same placement that Wentz had, IMO. But I wouldn't have said he had no ability or chance. I still wouldn't, even if watching Brock Osweiler from the bench isn't promising. Hackenberg and the Michigan State qb were just arm candy/all the tools choices that people should avoid.
Speaking of Lynch he still can't crack the starting lineup over Osweiler.
Wentz goes 1. Goff goes 2. Prescott goes in the 5th round.
Wentz is a more polished passer than Dak and has pretty good deep ball. Dak is very good at running his offense, he needs to improve his down the field passing to reach the next level.
Not likely what a year and draft especially with Elway and Marino, being the alpha and omega of the first round.will anything ever top 1983?