BlindFaith
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 5,047
- Reaction score
- 2,519
Lets just look at the front 7 of the LOB.
Two key guys on the line for them were Bennett and Irvin.
I see Lawrence and Gregory in those roles here.
Wagner and Wright. Should be Parsons and Smith.
That 43 under look that they ran fits our personnel very well.
We just drafted our Red Bryant in Bohanna. The Melborne role could be Urban or Gallimore.
I still think that a suprise trade could be trying to move LVE. Or flat out cutting him. He just doesnt fit here.
Cox is interesting. Do they dare try him in that Cam Chancellor role?
Diggs is Sherman.
Joseph a much better Maxwell.
But not having an Earl hurts. But, as has been mentioned, this could be where Lewis fits in. Hes no Earl in his prime, but hes the closest we have. I think hes better than Kwazee.
So yeah, if you want to call the Leo a LB, then technically you can call the 43 under a 34 look. As long as we dont go full blown 34 concept, Im actually pretty excited about what this defense can be.
Two key guys on the line for them were Bennett and Irvin.
I see Lawrence and Gregory in those roles here.
Wagner and Wright. Should be Parsons and Smith.
That 43 under look that they ran fits our personnel very well.
We just drafted our Red Bryant in Bohanna. The Melborne role could be Urban or Gallimore.
I still think that a suprise trade could be trying to move LVE. Or flat out cutting him. He just doesnt fit here.
Cox is interesting. Do they dare try him in that Cam Chancellor role?
Diggs is Sherman.
Joseph a much better Maxwell.
But not having an Earl hurts. But, as has been mentioned, this could be where Lewis fits in. Hes no Earl in his prime, but hes the closest we have. I think hes better than Kwazee.
So yeah, if you want to call the Leo a LB, then technically you can call the 43 under a 34 look. As long as we dont go full blown 34 concept, Im actually pretty excited about what this defense can be.