Yeah there is, and I explained it. Without going into detail, the sooner you extend a player, the lower their cap hits. The longer you wait, the more difficult it is to structure the contract.
why is that because another player reset the market???
In other words, let's get his contract/extension on the books NOW. This way we won't have to worry about his huge cap hit until 2026. Keep him 2-3 more years and start looking for an exit.
Absolutely right. Here is what a 4 year extension of 35M a year would look like.
See post 64. But you touched on another reason. Lamb would have been much cheaper had they paid him a year ago.
Our fans really are the worst, not so much you but others that want to TRADE literally 1 of if not THE BEST pass rushers in the league! Because why he speaks his mind, or because he wants to get what he financially deserves.!? Either way he's getting paid but our fan base complains about the lack of talent or drafting etc THEN complain when they play beyond OUR expectations and want to get paid then it's trade him or release them or I wouldn't pay them that much take this or leave it lmao, just Shut up!!
Why would he sign that knowing his value. Yall think these players and agents are stupid huh!?
I don't know what you mean. What part of that didn't you understand? Or are you disputing the 35M? Extensions start at the end of your rookie deal. It never replaces a rookie deal.
when we say cheaper because I hear this everyday, are we talking about? I mean a few million dollars isn't much these days now if it was 10 million dollars then yeah or more
Meaning he's not resigning a deal that doesn't set the market at his position...did you understand that time?
No. I still don't know what you are disputing. Where in my post did I not set the market? It's going to be between 35M to 40M, what difference does it make what example I used? What exactly in my post are you disputing?
where are you getting 4.3 million from?
That's obviously a mistake. It's a bit over 21 million.
lol. clickbait. that's not what was said.
and have the nerve to say "that's good business" lol
Obviously with they way they are handling CD, they are not concerned or view it that way.
Obviously. Or they would have paid him last year. My thinking is because they paid Diggs. You might want to stagger contracts so that big cap hits don't happen at the same time. There are other reasons they might not want to pay him. Remember, we as fans just think about cap hits. The people actually paying them think about real dollars. Dollars they're going to lose. They might not care about cap hits if it saves them money.
Your post had 35 mil rather that's what you meant or not that's what you posted and THATS the basis of what I'm saying
It's crazy man!
