Dayton Cowboy
Active Member
- Messages
- 1,864
- Reaction score
- 5
I haven't quite figured out where I'd say is the exact spot for him. But I have seen him projected the end of round one with the Colts. Which, I'd hate!!
dboyz;1467974 said:I think Ginn could have as big of an immediate impact on our team as anyone we draft. He would immediately be a special teams player and we could incorporate some special packages for him to use his speed. However, I have questions about whether he'll ever be an elite receiver.
Ginn would probably have more immediate impact than say... Jarrett. However, I would rather have Jarrett over the next ten years. I think he'll be an elite receiver.
Great post. This post is stat buster. Stats rarely ever tell the whole story. Ted Ginn Jr is an explosive player. A game changer. It was very evident that the OSU offense went in a tank after he was sidelined. Ginn's threat opene dup the entire offense for OSUJake0;1467296 said:The only stats I care about are how he does in big games. His performance against teams that OSU dismantles are pretty meaningless. None of these stats include returns, but if you watch the highlight videos on youtube, you know he broke a punt return on michigan and almost broke another in the '05 meeting. This is Michigan we're talking about here, who's gonna know more about OSU than Mich? So get the film study excuse out of here.
2005 OSU @ Michigan -> 9 catches 89 yards. Respectable, and also shows a little that he's more than just a deep ball guy.
2005 Fiesta Bowl vs ND -> 8 catches 167 yards 1td, 2 rushes 73 yards 1td. Completely dominates a bowl game.
2006 OSU @ Texas #1 vs #2 -> absolutely scorched them. Game turned into a blowout, if necessary he could have easily had more than 5 catches 97 yards and a td.
2006 Mich @ OSU #1 vs #2 again -> 8 catches 104 yards 1td.
National Title Game -> it's a pity that the idiot tackled him from behind
and took him out of the game, but that happening is probably the only reason we'd even have a shot at him at #22. However, the first time he did touch the ball in that game he ran it back for a touchdown.... IN THE NATIONAL TITLE GAME. It was also very apparent to me that OSU's offense went to **** with Ginn out. Gonzalez is good but by himself without Ginn drawing defenders, he was useless. Troy Smith was pressured quite a bit, but even when he had time, no one could gain any separation.
Ginn was pretty much always a major factor in every game with the spotlight all over him. I'll take someone who performs when it counts over someone who just pads his career statistics in garbage time when the other team is completely demoralized.
I've been on the trade up for Peterson bandwagon since day 1, we're in a good position to do so if he slips. But if he doesn't, then I want Ginn at 22 if he's there. Only people that have a slight chance of being there at 22 that I'd rather have than Ginn are Revis and maybe Meachem, who I've been hearing is a lock for top 15 lately.
Showing he had good games in 2 games per season is a stat buster?Charles;1468071 said:Great post. This post is stat buster. Stats rarely ever tell the whole story. Ted Ginn Jr is an explosive player. A game changer. It was very evident that the OSU offense went in a tank after he was sidelined. Ginn's threat opene dup the entire offense for OSU
LD Fan;1467264 said:Nice analysis. Based on these numbers, we should just wait and sign him as an undrafted FA.
theogt;1468076 said:Showing he had good games in 2 games per season is a stat buster?
How can you say "stats rarely ever tell the whole story" and then proclaim that the stats from only a couple games tell a better story than stats from an entire season?
Some people should think before posting.
True, but when you're picking in the 20's there aren't any players that don't have question marks. You can make the same case about every other player in the draft at that point. Heck, outside of Calvin Johnson, there really isn't another guy that most will agree on being a bona fide star.Gaede;1468217 said:I'm not gonna lie, this is a really interesting post and has me re-thinking Ginn altogether.
I think guys like Anthony Spencer, Brandon Meriweather, Robert Meachem, and Dwayne Bowe simply have less question marks.DTK;1468223 said:True, but when you're picking in the 20's there aren't any players that don't have question marks. You can make the same case about every other player in the draft at that point. Heck, outside of Calvin Johnson, there really isn't another guy that most will agree on being a bona fide star.
But to say Ginn didn't produce in college is a farce. His stats are what they are. But he played in a VERY conservative offense that made the kicker look like a star. Ginn produced. If he didn't, he wouldn't be considered a 1st round pick.theogt;1468234 said:I think guys like Anthony Spencer, Brandon Meriweather, Robert Meachem, and Dwayne Bowe simply have less question marks.
Those guys have the measurables and they produced in college.
In my opinion, he didn't produce. Just look at the stats. Production = getting yardage. He didn't do it.DTK;1468244 said:But to say Ginn didn't produce in college is a farce. His stats are what they are. But he played in a VERY conservative offense that made the kicker look like a star. Ginn produced. If he didn't, he wouldn't be considered a 1st round pick.
I guess you missed the first post in this thread.InmanRoshi;1468252 said:Now throw in his return yards and you'll get the total story. I don't know why anyone would think WR stats are vastly more insigificant than return stats. As far as I know, kick returns TD's count the same amount of points as reception TD's. And a guy who can punt and kick return touch the ball around 4-5 times a game just in returns. Even All Pro WR's only touch the ball around 6 times a game.