A Look At Ted Ginn Jr.

Dayton Cowboy

Active Member
Messages
1,864
Reaction score
5
I haven't quite figured out where I'd say is the exact spot for him. But I have seen him projected the end of round one with the Colts. Which, I'd hate!!
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
I would not move up to get Ginn but at 22 I would have no issue with drafting him.
 

dboyz

Active Member
Messages
819
Reaction score
101
I think Ginn could have as big of an immediate impact on our team as anyone we draft. He would immediately be a special teams player and we could incorporate some special packages for him to use his speed. However, I have questions about whether he'll ever be an elite receiver.

Ginn would probably have more immediate impact than say... Jarrett. However, I would rather have Jarrett over the next ten years. I think he'll be an elite receiver.
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
dboyz;1467974 said:
I think Ginn could have as big of an immediate impact on our team as anyone we draft. He would immediately be a special teams player and we could incorporate some special packages for him to use his speed. However, I have questions about whether he'll ever be an elite receiver.

Ginn would probably have more immediate impact than say... Jarrett. However, I would rather have Jarrett over the next ten years. I think he'll be an elite receiver.

I think Ginn will be a guy who will force defense to double up on him. In one on one situation Ginn is too fast and athletic. I think Ginn is a big reason Gonzales is being looked at as a 2nd rd pick as teams focused on the threat of Ginn. As for Jarrett I like him and think he has a chance to be a very good WR in his own right.
 

Angus

Active Member
Messages
5,097
Reaction score
20
I've read that Ginn prefers to play defense. If he is chosen by Dallas (or by whomever) and can't correct his poor route running or find better hands, he may end up a corner. Still a "wow" at kick and punt returns, either way.

:)
 

Charles

Benched
Messages
3,408
Reaction score
1
Jake0;1467296 said:
The only stats I care about are how he does in big games. His performance against teams that OSU dismantles are pretty meaningless. None of these stats include returns, but if you watch the highlight videos on youtube, you know he broke a punt return on michigan and almost broke another in the '05 meeting. This is Michigan we're talking about here, who's gonna know more about OSU than Mich? So get the film study excuse out of here.

2005 OSU @ Michigan -> 9 catches 89 yards. Respectable, and also shows a little that he's more than just a deep ball guy.

2005 Fiesta Bowl vs ND -> 8 catches 167 yards 1td, 2 rushes 73 yards 1td. Completely dominates a bowl game.

2006 OSU @ Texas #1 vs #2 -> absolutely scorched them. Game turned into a blowout, if necessary he could have easily had more than 5 catches 97 yards and a td.

2006 Mich @ OSU #1 vs #2 again -> 8 catches 104 yards 1td.

National Title Game -> it's a pity that the idiot tackled him from behind
and took him out of the game, but that happening is probably the only reason we'd even have a shot at him at #22. However, the first time he did touch the ball in that game he ran it back for a touchdown.... IN THE NATIONAL TITLE GAME. It was also very apparent to me that OSU's offense went to **** with Ginn out. Gonzalez is good but by himself without Ginn drawing defenders, he was useless. Troy Smith was pressured quite a bit, but even when he had time, no one could gain any separation.

Ginn was pretty much always a major factor in every game with the spotlight all over him. I'll take someone who performs when it counts over someone who just pads his career statistics in garbage time when the other team is completely demoralized.

I've been on the trade up for Peterson bandwagon since day 1, we're in a good position to do so if he slips. But if he doesn't, then I want Ginn at 22 if he's there. Only people that have a slight chance of being there at 22 that I'd rather have than Ginn are Revis and maybe Meachem, who I've been hearing is a lock for top 15 lately.
Great post. This post is stat buster. Stats rarely ever tell the whole story. Ted Ginn Jr is an explosive player. A game changer. It was very evident that the OSU offense went in a tank after he was sidelined. Ginn's threat opene dup the entire offense for OSU
 

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
Charles;1468071 said:
Great post. This post is stat buster. Stats rarely ever tell the whole story. Ted Ginn Jr is an explosive player. A game changer. It was very evident that the OSU offense went in a tank after he was sidelined. Ginn's threat opene dup the entire offense for OSU
Showing he had good games in 2 games per season is a stat buster?

How can you say "stats rarely ever tell the whole story" and then proclaim that the stats from only a couple games tell a better story than stats from an entire season?

Some people should think before posting.
 

Concord

Mr. Buckeye
Messages
12,825
Reaction score
119
Just DO IT!

Pick him Jerry!

41a1d4325ef48-41a1d43e775ba.jpg
 

GimmeTheBall!

Junior College Transfer
Messages
37,692
Reaction score
18,042
LD Fan;1467264 said:
Nice analysis. Based on these numbers, we should just wait and sign him as an undrafted FA.

:laugh2:

No worries for the naysayers.
Ginn will be long gone by the 12th pick (no matter what his stats tell us.) He's moot for us.

The scouts see someone who can develop into a bona-fide superstar in the NFL, stats notwithstanding.
 

Rack

Federal Agent
Messages
23,906
Reaction score
3,106
theogt;1468076 said:
Showing he had good games in 2 games per season is a stat buster?

How can you say "stats rarely ever tell the whole story" and then proclaim that the stats from only a couple games tell a better story than stats from an entire season?

Some people should think before posting.

:hammer:
 

DTK

Active Member
Messages
735
Reaction score
86
As a fan of THE OSU, I think some of you are forgetting one big factor in Ginn's stats: JIM TRESSELL!!! The guy is a ball control freak. He very rarely looks to go deep and would often use Ginn on WR screens and that's about it. Now, I will admit that his route running needs some serious work, but from all accounts about the kid, he's a hardworker who will put the time in to get better.

Also, Tressell is known for saving his "best" plays for the big games, i.e. Michigan, bowl games. He also plays close to the vest and is very leary of showing too much on game tapes. I really believe that had an effect on Ginn's stats.

You can't coach speed and Ginn has plenty to spare. It's not like he's the second coming of Alexander Wright. Ginn is a football player. At 22, I would have no problem with this selection. Don't know that I would trade up, but... I understand the concerns based on previous 1st Round busts, like Troy Williamson.
 

Gaede

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,165
Reaction score
14,127
I'm not gonna lie, this is a really interesting post and has me re-thinking Ginn altogether.
 

Tristan

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,221
Reaction score
583
theogt,

My point was not what you said it is, I was simply saying that there are different ways a player can be productive, stats are one of them. Terrell owens can be taken out of a game if a defense decides to use all it's recources to do so.

It's obvious to me that he provides a double edged sword to defenses, if they leave him single covered he will tear them up, if they decide to commit extra defenders to contain him then his personal stats will suffer naturally, but this is a very valuable form of production IMO.

It's no secret we disagree on this player, and thats fine, I have no interest in making you change your mind.

I think my point about Newman was quite valid, I guess you just see it differently, fine.

Another example is a guy like Barry Bonds, he's so dangerous they don't pitch to him, naturally his stats suffer fron this, but it can help the team. A nose tackle will sacrifice himself to free up other defenders, this is considered a good thing.

If Ginns talents cause defenses
to have to commit extra resources to stop him, then Ginn is essentially sacrificing himself to free up others.

To me it's clear his overall impact is huge, obviously you can look into specific technical differences in my analogies to state that I'm wrong, but I'm just trying to make basic point on looking at the whole picture, if you don't see it my way, thats fine, I won't go around trying to say your wrong though, you just have a different opinion on the players productiveness and value than I do.

I think considering that the majority of the time he was playing against defenses specifically schemed to contain him, that his stats are very impressive. It's not just speed, it's what you do with that speed. I can't think of any play more exciting than the deep fly pattern TD, and Ginn is one of the best I've ever seen at this.
 

DTK

Active Member
Messages
735
Reaction score
86
Gaede;1468217 said:
I'm not gonna lie, this is a really interesting post and has me re-thinking Ginn altogether.
True, but when you're picking in the 20's there aren't any players that don't have question marks. You can make the same case about every other player in the draft at that point. Heck, outside of Calvin Johnson, there really isn't another guy that most will agree on being a bona fide star.
 

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
DTK;1468223 said:
True, but when you're picking in the 20's there aren't any players that don't have question marks. You can make the same case about every other player in the draft at that point. Heck, outside of Calvin Johnson, there really isn't another guy that most will agree on being a bona fide star.
I think guys like Anthony Spencer, Brandon Meriweather, Robert Meachem, and Dwayne Bowe simply have less question marks.

Those guys have the measurables and they produced in college.
 

DTK

Active Member
Messages
735
Reaction score
86
theogt;1468234 said:
I think guys like Anthony Spencer, Brandon Meriweather, Robert Meachem, and Dwayne Bowe simply have less question marks.

Those guys have the measurables and they produced in college.
But to say Ginn didn't produce in college is a farce. His stats are what they are. But he played in a VERY conservative offense that made the kicker look like a star. Ginn produced. If he didn't, he wouldn't be considered a 1st round pick.
 

InmanRoshi

Zone Scribe
Messages
18,334
Reaction score
90
Now throw in his return yards and you'll get the total story. I don't know why anyone would think return stats are insignificant. As far as I know, kick returns TD's count the same amount of points in the NFL as reception TD's. And a guy who can do both punt and kick returns will touch the ball around 4-5 times a game just in returns. Even All Pro WR's only touch the ball around 6 times a game (Torry Holt only averaged 5.8 receptions per game in 2006). Also throw in the number of times opposing teams kick the ball short and out of bounds to avoid returns, and you're racking up hidden yardage. Also, Ginn also rushed for 200 yards in reverses. So, when discussing Ginn, I think its only fair to include all the ways he can give your team yards and points. Even if Ginn only provides half the WR production that Meachem or Bowe does next year, there is still a pretty good chance that he will have more of an impact for his team once you account for receptions, punt returns, kick off returns, reverses and option passes.

Also, just having that kind of a speed threat on the field benefits the entire offense. Reggie Bush may not have been a statistical wonder for New Orleans last year, but teams had to account for him everytime he was on the field. Defenses had to allocate extra resources to account for him, because he was on the field because he was a threat to go the distance every time he touched the ball, which acted as a catalyst and opened things up for other players. So instead of a linebacker typically covering the RB out of the backfield, defenses had to use a free safety on Bush which made their secondary vulnerable for New Orleans WR's.
 

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
DTK;1468244 said:
But to say Ginn didn't produce in college is a farce. His stats are what they are. But he played in a VERY conservative offense that made the kicker look like a star. Ginn produced. If he didn't, he wouldn't be considered a 1st round pick.
In my opinion, he didn't produce. Just look at the stats. Production = getting yardage. He didn't do it.

InmanRoshi;1468252 said:
Now throw in his return yards and you'll get the total story. I don't know why anyone would think WR stats are vastly more insigificant than return stats. As far as I know, kick returns TD's count the same amount of points as reception TD's. And a guy who can punt and kick return touch the ball around 4-5 times a game just in returns. Even All Pro WR's only touch the ball around 6 times a game.
I guess you missed the first post in this thread.
 

DTK

Active Member
Messages
735
Reaction score
86
He got less than 2 yards per completion when compared to Bowe. LESS THAN 2 YARDS.

So by that standard, Eddie Kennison is a better receiver than Torry Holt because he averaged 16 yards per catch compared to Holt's 12????? You can have Kennison, I'll take Holt.
 

DTK

Active Member
Messages
735
Reaction score
86
To be clear on this, I'm not dissing your research or saying your point isn't a valid concern. I just think it's wrong to say Ted Ginn didn't produce. The guys you mentioned have just as many question marks as Ginn does.
 
Top