theogt;3307080 said:
Actually, I tend to agree with the conclusion, but it's horribly written (in desperate need of an editor) and offers little persuasive argument in favor of signing the guy.
Quality over quantity. Just because it's a long post, doesn't mean it's a good one.
Well, if you want to nit-pick it you can and that's all on you, haha.
I was just saying that it's refreshing to see a post in which someone attempts to say "we should sign X and this is why" as opposed to "GO GET 'EM JERRY, HAMLIN SUCKS CUT HIM DUMP THAT SALARY! HE SHOULD BE SIGNED BY THE TIME I HIT THE SUBMIT BUTTONZ!!!1"
But, good points, theogt. All points taken.