A true blue chip player is what a 4th pick demands

Right so they will take the job of one of the 22 starters under contract fron a 4-12 team. Thats the point.

No, that logic doesn't dominate the observation at all...that rests totally on BPA, and blue chip levels.
 
No, that logic doesn't dominate the observation at all...that rests totally on BPA, and blue chip levels.

You keep chipping away big guy. At some point your gibberish is going to make sense to someone...
 
I really like Ramsey a lot, but he's a FS in this league. We *might* be able to get away with him at SS, like the Eagles did with Thurmond and Jenkins. The big thing we need is the ability to mix up our coverages and to tackle the ball carriers. We need to get safeties that can play more man and deep zone coverage so our corners don't have to play man all of the time and can mix in some zone as well. We need safeties that can position themselves in the zone so errant passes, tipped passes, QB and receiver not on the same page and dropped passes that go up into the air can be picked off. Ramsey has the ability to play man to do that. I don't know about how good he is in zone and what his tackling is like. The thing is that the league doesn't need safeties that can lay the wood, especially these days where it will be a flag and a fine anyway. They need guys that can immediately track down the ball carrier and make a form tackle so the ballcarrier is stopped.

I don't see Hargreaves as a #4 overall pick. He's really the last type of player we need...another cover corner type that isn't the most capable tackler. I've had enough of those for the past 15 years.







YR

Would you take Ramsey over Church at strong safety?
 
You keep chipping away big guy. At some point your gibberish is going to make sense to someone...

If your bottom line is insult, then just keep on moving on...Son.
 
If your bottom line is insult, then just keep on moving on...Son.

You bring it on yourself. I am sure you think it sounds super smart, but when you say things like "doesn't dominate the observation" it makes you sound like an idiot that is trying to be condescending but just sounds like an idiot. Understand..Son?
 
You bring it on yourself. I am sure you think it sounds super smart, but when you say things like "doesn't dominate the observation" it makes you sound like an idiot that is trying to be condescending but just sounds like an idiot. Understand..Son?

Look Son, talk about topic and leave your analysis of other's worth to them...or just move on. You aren't that dense or high class to set your own value as the standard for value. That part is debatable, and not ground for insult.

If you feel consumed with an appearance of dominance around conversation...grow up. Discussion of presented facts is an element of discussion, even if you wish to be able to say there is trash in all non-compliant responses to what you want seen as to qualitites in football. But the defining element is not your agreement of style or word selections, but elements around football.

Can't handle that, then that's on YOU. But anything further that you don't like, take it to a PM conversation.
 
It's hard to say because we don't know which of these prospects are going to be blue chippers. But, let's assume this draft will be like the 1989 draft (Troy Aikman, Barry Sanders, Derrick Thomas and Deion Sanders). Who would I pick?
You gotta go quarterback so Goff would be the pick. Then it would be Bosa, then Anderson.
 
I don't really want a CB...but Mac Alexander is a stud
 
Goff. How could you pass up a chance to get the next Aaron Rodgers. Even if he sits for 3 years. If not him give me the guy who will touch the rock 30 times a game, even at number 4. Zeke!
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
464,666
Messages
13,825,243
Members
23,781
Latest member
Vloh10
Back
Top