Tanner is not any better than any of the backs you named. But Felix Jones is apparently.
tayloner Well-Known Member Messages 463 Reaction score 320 Aug 23, 2013 #61 Alexander said: Tanner is not any better than any of the backs you named. Click to expand... But Felix Jones is apparently.
Alexander said: Tanner is not any better than any of the backs you named. Click to expand... But Felix Jones is apparently.
Alexander What's it going to be then, eh? Messages 62,482 Reaction score 67,294 Aug 23, 2013 #62 tayloner182 said: But Felix Jones is apparently. Click to expand... I doubt the Steelers asked. And if they did, we probably said no.
tayloner182 said: But Felix Jones is apparently. Click to expand... I doubt the Steelers asked. And if they did, we probably said no.
erod Well-Known Member Messages 38,705 Reaction score 60,327 Aug 23, 2013 #63 If you want a starting caliber guard, you can trade for him. But you'll have to give up a good player in return with a low salary. Bruce Carter, Terrance Williams, James Hanna, Jermey Parnell, Demarco Murray...... They're not going to give up a starting guard for your aging veterans or backup nobodies.
If you want a starting caliber guard, you can trade for him. But you'll have to give up a good player in return with a low salary. Bruce Carter, Terrance Williams, James Hanna, Jermey Parnell, Demarco Murray...... They're not going to give up a starting guard for your aging veterans or backup nobodies.
SkinsandTerps Commanders Forever Messages 7,627 Reaction score 125 Aug 23, 2013 #64 I just don't understand why the OP thinks that Denver needs a WR ??? Manning has never "needed" a great WR corps, same as Tom Brady. One great one and a bunch of random guys, typically.
I just don't understand why the OP thinks that Denver needs a WR ??? Manning has never "needed" a great WR corps, same as Tom Brady. One great one and a bunch of random guys, typically.