Adam Schefter on Mike and Mike

[Montanalo]

The focus of Schefter's dialogue on Mike and Mike was the threatened Jerry Jones law suit against the NFL.

Fundamentally, Schefter opined that the law suit was nothing more than a power grab - Jerry Jones wants to take over the NFL. There was no mention of the Zeke Elliott case nor any mention of the recent Tom Stokes article "connecting the dots".

I'm paraphrasing here, but the consensus was Jerry had no basis for the lawsuit, didn't have much support amongst other owners, was out of line and that Goodell would ultimately get an extension.

Normally, I am a big supporter of M&M, but in this case, their discourse seemed baised and shortsighted.

 

[AbeBeta]

Normally, I am a big supporter of M&M, but in this case, their discourse seemed baised and shortsighted.

Sounds more like you didn't like the conclusions.

Not liking what someone says is not the same as them being biased.

 

[Swanny]

I do think Jerry is out if line. But I don't care. I want whatever it takes to get Goodell out if town.

 

[superonyx]

I can't blame Jerry for being concerned that Goodell is failing to perform his duty to increase the value of the nfl.
All the signs point in the wrong direction and Goodell has made enough mistakes to not deserve the job any longer.

It must be frustrating to be powerless and watch as this buffoon drives down the value of your business and net worth.

 

[DallasDomination]

Shefter is a sell out. You ever go to nfl.com ? There's never anything relevant about zeke or Jerry. He's another NFL groupie.

 

[Fletch]

Sounds more like you didn't like the conclusions.

Not liking what someone says is not the same as them being biased.

It’s more like Schefter is the NFL’s mouthpiece, using his employer, a national outlet like ESPN, as a platform for public persuasion.

 

[YosemiteSam]

The focus of Schefter's dialogue on Mike and Mike was the threatened Jerry Jones law suit against the NFL.

Fundamentally, Schefter opined that the law suit was nothing more than a power grab - Jerry Jones wants to take over the NFL. There was no mention of the Zeke Elliott case nor any mention of the recent Tom Stokes article "connecting the dots".

I'm paraphrasing here, but the consensus was Jerry had no basis for the lawsuit, didn't have much support amongst other owners, was out of line and that Goodell would ultimately get an extension.

Normally, I am a big supporter of M&M, but in this case, their discourse seemed baised and shortsighted.

Adam Schefter is enough to ignore the entire segment. He is the Mohammed Saeed al-Sahaf of NFL News

 

[Idgit]

It'll be interesting to watch who sides where as this thing starts to take shape.

You're already seeing ESPN articles quoting unnamed sources aimed at getting the league out ahead of the PR battle.

It'll be interesting to see the coverage on NFLN today as the wagons circle.

 

[Denim Chicken]

The funny thing is that, while it may be possible that Jerry does not have support from the other owners, NFL fans--who ultimately matter the most in terms of revenue and ratings--would overwhelmingly vote Goodell out if given the option. This may be a power play for Jerry, but removing Goodell would be good for the league. He could be scapegoated for a lot of the NFL's issues and new leadership would invigorate league.

 

[Montanalo]

Sounds more like you didn't like the conclusions.

Not liking what someone says is not the same as them being biased.

Not, that is

Sounds more like you didn't like the conclusions.

Not liking what someone says is not the same as them being biased.

Fair observation, but not necessarily the case.

Maybe it is a power grab by Jones. Who knows? It just seems to me that the reporting was skewed with no mention of Zeke and limited or no mention of the NFL's handling of the national anthem protest - both of which appear to be key drivers for Jones's action.

 

[Stash]

 

[Bullflop]

Shefter is a sell out. You ever go to nfl.com ? There's never anything relevant about zeke or Jerry. He's another NFL groupie.

Shefter earns his living basically through staying in the NFL's good graces.

Jerry has always been loyal to his players and what they bring to the table.

It's really not too surprising that he forcefully takes the stand that he does.

 

[Aven8]

Now I can't help but think of Schefter as they guy with interest in sports gambling after reading that article yesterday.....

I like Mort better myself.

 

[Montanalo]

Adam Schefter is enough to ignore the entire segment. He is the Mohammed Saeed al-Sahaf of NFL News

Ok, i admit it, I listened to Schefter... I have sinned

 

[diefree666]

Sounds more like you didn't like the conclusions.

Not liking what someone says is not the same as them being biased.

He took the time to think on it unlike you it seems

 

[AbeBeta]

He took the time to think on it unlike you it seems

He listens to a show where people present opinions.

Then complains because this show - which focuses on opinions - is "biased"

I do not think that means what he thinks it means

 

[diefree666]

He listens to a show where people present opinions.

Then complains because this show - which focuses on opinions - is "biased"

I do not think that means what he thinks it means

and of course you ignore the points he brought up as regards Zeke, etc.

That is an indication of knee jerk not thinking.

 

[Risen Star]

Keep in mind Schefter is routinely on Philly sports radio being best buds with those scumbags with a heavy pro Eagles, anti Cowboys diatribe.

Bleep him. He's a weasel.

 

[Montanalo]

He listens to a show where people present opinions.

Then complains because this show - which focuses on opinions - is "biased"

I do not think that means what he thinks it means

Not to prolong the discussion, but I didn't just listen and opine. I made reference to other, relevant issues that potentially have direct bearing on the Jones lawsuit (Zeke, national anthem protest, Tom Stokes article) that were not addressed or even mention by Schefter or the hosts.

 

[Jake]

The focus of Schefter's dialogue on Mike and Mike was the threatened Jerry Jones law suit against the NFL.

Fundamentally, Schefter opined that the law suit was nothing more than a power grab - Jerry Jones wants to take over the NFL. There was no mention of the Zeke Elliott case nor any mention of the recent Tom Stokes article "connecting the dots".

I'm paraphrasing here, but the consensus was Jerry had no basis for the lawsuit, didn't have much support amongst other owners, was out of line and that Goodell would ultimately get an extension.

Normally, I am a big supporter of M&M, but in this case, their discourse seemed baised and shortsighted.

Were we listening to the same broadcast?

He said Jerry wouldn't win and Goodell would get his extension, both of which are probably true. At the end of the day, players and owners of other teams aren't losing their minds over Zeke's case. As much as we'd like to see a groundswell of support, most don't see it as their problem. It's simply our problem.