Tenkamenin
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 4,605
- Reaction score
- 4,026
It’s popular to demonize Jerry. What’s unique is that he doesn’t give a........
Keep in mind Schefter is routinely on Philly sports radio being best buds with those scumbags with a heavy pro Eagles, anti Cowboys diatribe.
Bleep him. He's a weasel.
It’s popular to demonize Jerry. What’s unique is that he doesn’t give a........
Then why didn't you just say Baghdad Bob...........................rolls of the tongue.Mohammed Saeed al-Sahaf - IS - Baghdad Bob.
They are the same person. Real name vs Internet pseudo-name
I agree with him, they don't support the Cowboys, then they must be biased and sent to the Pit of Misery! Someone fill in the rest. LOL
I do think Jerry is out if line. But I don't care. I want whatever it takes to get Goodell out if town.
I was listening to Mike and Mike a couple of days ago and Greenberg even questioned why the NFL would go after its most darling franchise for something so controversial when they already have numerous of other issues.The focus of Schefter's dialogue on Mike and Mike was the threatened Jerry Jones law suit against the NFL.
Fundamentally, Schefter opined that the law suit was nothing more than a power grab - Jerry Jones wants to take over the NFL. There was no mention of the Zeke Elliott case nor any mention of the recent Tom Stokes article "connecting the dots".
I'm paraphrasing here, but the consensus was Jerry had no basis for the lawsuit, didn't have much support amongst other owners, was out of line and that Goodell would ultimately get an extension.
Normally, I am a big supporter of M&M, but in this case, their discourse seemed baised and shortsighted.
I was listening to Mike and Mike a couple of days ago and Greenberg even questioned why the NFL would go after its most darling franchise for something so controversial when they already have numerous of other issues.
NFL War of attrition. The NFL started it, and Jerry is only firing back. This IMO is good for the fans (forcing the powerful to level the playing field) in the same way this whole Harvey Weinstein thing will end up being a positive for the less powerful people in all walks of professional life.
unfortunatelyWere we listening to the same broadcast?
He said Jerry wouldn't win and Goodell would get his extension, both of which are probably true. At the end of the day, players and owners of other teams aren't losing their minds over Zeke's case. As much as we'd like to see a groundswell of support, most don't see it as their problem. It's simply our problem.
Absolutely true..... but Rog is a powertripping powerhungry personality.It’s popular to demonize Jerry. What’s unique is that he doesn’t give a........
The focus of Schefter's dialogue on Mike and Mike was the threatened Jerry Jones law suit against the NFL.
Fundamentally, Schefter opined that the law suit was nothing more than a power grab - Jerry Jones wants to take over the NFL. There was no mention of the Zeke Elliott case nor any mention of the recent Tom Stokes article "connecting the dots".
I'm paraphrasing here, but the consensus was Jerry had no basis for the lawsuit, didn't have much support amongst other owners, was out of line and that Goodell would ultimately get an extension.
Normally, I am a big supporter of M&M, but in this case, their discourse seemed baised and shortsighted.
Keep in mind Schefter is routinely on Philly sports radio being best buds with those scumbags with a heavy pro Eagles, anti Cowboys diatribe.
Bleep him. He's a weasel.
Not liking what someone says is not the same as them being biased.