I still take Montana over Brady.
The stupidity of the Seahawks and Falcons… basically gifted Brady two more rings
I hear you. I'd still take Brady, even if you robbed him of his ability to cheat, over Montana..... because I I THINK Montana had the benefit of catching the wave of the West Coast Offense well before defenses knew how to defend it...whereas Brady, even if he had chosen not to cheat (which unfortunately he didn't) could beat any team without the advantage of running a revolutionary offense.
Meaning....if Montana got yanked from back in time, and got switched with Brady, and Brady played for San Fran in Montana's era....I have 0 doubt Brady still would have killed it in SanFran....whereas I have like 2 or 3 % uncertainty that Montana might not have succeeded as much in New England in 2000 onwards the way Brady did. Brady was ALWAYS the best player on his team. Montana always the 2nd best player on his team
Still..... Montana is a somewhat close 2nd for me.
I agree Seattle pizzed 1 right on his finger....but I think Brady betch smacked Atlanta and took that one.