G2
Taco Engineer
- Messages
- 24,452
- Reaction score
- 26,199
They're included. They're called incompletions. You didn't review the videoes, did you?Im sorry, but if youre gonna do this then you have to include the two ints that the Jets dropped
They're included. They're called incompletions. You didn't review the videoes, did you?Im sorry, but if youre gonna do this then you have to include the two ints that the Jets dropped
He thought you meant the other definition of incompletionThey're included. They're called incompletions. You didn't review the videoes, did you?
Oh! That one, got it.He thought you meant the other definition of incompletion
Because they get used to having to jump or reach back for the often off target ball.Why in the blue hell do the receivers jump for nothing on this team?
You should google how ESPN calculates QBR and educate yourself. Or you could keep being an ignorant clown with no clue.You clearly have no idea how basic math works. Efficiency of a QB can clearly go up in softer coverages that are meant to keep everything inside and run time off the clock.
You should google how ESPN calculates QBR and educate yourself. Or you could keep being an ignorant clown with no clue.
Here’s a very quick lesson:
A 10-yard completion on 3rd and 20 counts for MUCH less than, say, a 10-yard completion on 3rd and 9.
No I didnt. Now I wanna fight youThey're included. They're called incompletions. You didn't review the videoes, did you?
“Total QBR takes each individual play and measures the expected points added (EPA) for each play. Since every play situation is different, there is a different value for EPA in each case. A team can expect a 0.9 net-point advantage when it is 1st down and 10 yards to go on their own 20 yard line.And? What does that have to do with soft defenses and keeping everything inside to burn tome the clock? Are you saying teams only so that on 3rd and 20 and not 3rd and NINE? How often do teams get in a 3rd and 20 situation anyways bruh?
Maybe after your naptime.No I didnt. Now I wanna fight you
“Total QBR takes each individual play and measures the expected points added (EPA) for each play. Since every play situation is different, there is a different value for EPA in each case. A team can expect a 0.9 net-point advantage when it is 1st down and 10 yards to go on their own 20 yard line.
For the next play, suppose the team passes the ball 8 yards to reach their own 28 yard line on 2nd down and 2. The offense can now expect a 1.4 net-point advantage. EPA is the difference in the expected points at the start and end of a play. In this case it is 1.4 - 0.9 = 0.5 EPA. In a way, the offense has added a half point in potential score based on this play. Similarly, if a team loses yardage on a play, their EPA in that situation would be negative.”
——————————
It’s essentially based on how much each play helps a team score and eventually win.
So carving up a “soft defense” late in a blowout (which wasn’t the case yesterday anyways) doesn’t help your QBR much.
And if poor QB play is what led to the deficit to begin with, that’s calculated too.
QBR is a much better stat than traditional passer rating in this regard. It also takes sacks, fumbles, drops and QB runs into account, unlike traditional passer rating.
Here you go.Please inform me where anything of what our write refuted anything Of what I said? Where does your example take into account the TIME left in a game as opposed to yardage left to get a first down or score?
Here you go.
———————
There is a discount on trash time. A 40-yard pass as time expires (without scoring a touchdown or field goal) is much different from a 40-yard pass with enough time to score points.
That was just an example. Here’s some more context.so we are talking about as time EXPIRES now and not ‘enough time’ to score points... you do realize your proving exactly my point... garbage time against soft defense is NOT time expiring..
That was just an example. Here’s some more context.
——————————
QBR asks one more question: Did this play come in garbage time?
As we know, amassing yards and points in a blowout does not tell you too much about a quarterback’s true skill. When the game is out of reach, which is measured by a team’s win probability at the start of the play, a quarterback receives less credit than on an otherwise “normal” play.
The good ones make those catches. Every qb make off target passes. But somehow their wrs make miraculous catches
I don’t know the exact formula, but yes, I’d assume win probability goes up when the score is closer.So how is ‘win probability’ determined? Does if for example go up when the lead goes from 17 to 14 in the fourth quarter?
If the ball hits the WR’s hands, the QB DID make the throw.The good QBs make those throws....every WR drops passes.
The generic excuses can be applied anywhere.
Anyone else notice how a quick slant would have killed most of these defensive play (listed in the tweets)? There was no one in the middle of the field. I dont know if Dak is being told not to change the play, or just chooses not too, but these are very clear blitzing plays presnap by the D and no one checks into quick routes. The quickest was a 10 yard hook.
Wha.... What?