What we need is depth. That one player isn't likely to be the key. Defensive players have historically been more than twice as likely to get injured as offensive players. So, if you want a good defense, you need to improve the depth so if a key player does get injured, he can be replaced by another quality player. Unlike the offense where the QB is the linchpin for their performance, you really don't have that on defense.
Where we got into trouble on defense over the years is lack of depth due to trading up and losing picks (i.e. Claiborne and Lawrence) and then the suspensions to Gregory and Lawrence. Then Lawrence gets injured and Hardy doesn't work out. So we basically played most of the season without our starting DE's (Gregory and Lawrence) and that forced us to play players out of position.
The worst thing we can do is panic and overpay for a Free Agent or trade up to get a DE and give away picks.
YR
yes, what we need is depth - in players that consistently demand double teams.
we have 0.
we have a bunch of JAGs.
Collins and Irving have some potential but not what you gamble a year of your championship window with.
tcrawford - does anyone think he will get better - how many years has it been?
it was a calculated gamble that did not work out for us - it happens, you cannot win them all - problem is his cap structure.
if we spent $5M more per yr per player when we signed tcrawford and thornton, we could have gotten 2 players that would consistently demand double-team.
now, we have mostly rotational guys.
gregory is not likely to ever play again unless the weed policy changes.
does anyone think he can stay clean for 1 year???
dlaw had a back problem the entire year - does anyone think that is going to get better?
that is why rodgers had a lawn party at our expense
for the millionth time, there is plenty of cap space.
demand better from the FO
DONT SETTLE FOR EXCUSES BECAUSE THERE IS PLENTY OF CAP SPACE