I'm just curious, what possible reason do the referees have to be biased against the Cowboys? Do the get paid some sort of year end bonus that goes up relative to the number of games the Cowboys lose? What's in it for them?
Fans love to complain about bias, but no one can prove that because it involves thought and motive, and no one is a mind reader.
As an baseball umpire, I can tell you that 99.9 percent of the umpires and referees aren't calling plays for teams they like or teams they don't like.
First, if you have a favorite team or you have a relative on a team, you're automatically excluded from umping or reffing your favorite team's game.
Second, when the game is being played, there's really no time to think about being bias. Most of the time, you're just trying to get the call correct. Many of these calls are split-second decisions. You don't have time to think, "Hhhmm, I don't like this team. Let me call it against him."
Now, I
WILL say if you're being a behind, you're more likely to not get the benefit of the doubt on certain calls. But that is a premeditated mindset rather than an instantaneous mindset when you have to make a split-decision about a call. The premeditated mindset would more involve personal fouls or unsportsmanlike conduct where a player pushes the edge, and the ref may not give him the benefit of the doubt.
In short, refs - in all likelihood - aren't showing bias, and there's no way to prove it anyway.
But refs
CAN and
DO make mistakes. I've made mistakes calling balls and strikes and tag outs.
That's part of being human.