JohnsKey19
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 19,701
- Reaction score
- 18,732
Except the court didn't rule on this case and in these circumstances. Brady was a different case entirely.Nope, because the appeals court will not look at the actual case. It'll look at whether the league has the right to suspend Zeke under the current CBA.
The courts already ruled on this with Brady, and he lost. Kessler just wants to drag it out for as long as he can. Zeke is going to lose in the end, but he won't have to serve a suspension until next year if Kessler can delay, delay, delay.
Meanwhile, the NFLPA will use this year to beat Tiffany Thompson's reputation to shreds, and turn the public against the NFL.
Problem is, the NFL knows to the second when their appeal is released...natural head start on running to a court house after the appeal results.
Im not quite sure what this means. Head start to what? They can't headoff a attempt at an injunction. They will deny the appeal and wait until an injunction ruling before they can do anything legally.
Except the court didn't rule on this case and in these circumstances. Brady was a different case entirely.
Except the court didn't rule on this case and in these circumstances. Brady was a different case entirely.
It's even worse when you couple the timeline with their statement. Go read Harvey's defense. It starts by admiring the victim and then lays out their flimsy case. All of Zeke's defense is tacked on at the end. It reads exactly like what you'd expect out of a case made by only listening to one side. And the timeline absolutely support that conclusion.
Not quite. Look to the Brady case.
They knew Brady would file a suit, so they pre-emptively filed a suit asking the courts to back their decision. The reason behind this was to get the court case in a venue they believed would be beneficial to them - in that case, NY. They wanted to prevent Brady from first filing in a more player friendly district, such as Minnesota and Judge Doty.
They could do the same thing here. Quickly file in NY prior to Elliott filing in a court venue that might be more favorable to Elliott.
Except the court didn't rule on this case and in these circumstances. Brady was a different case entirely.
i like your reasoningBluff tactics? I think they both settle with 3 game suspension and move on. Don't see either side wanting this one to smell up the NFL any worse than it has.
i agree---if they thought Zeke would be out first 6 games no reason to give him any touches against Raiders..they know something we dont and i think filing injunction which i heard can occur before appeal occursI still think they will be able to fast track an injunction. I think the team knew that and that is why Zeke got touches the 3rd game. JMO
This supports my theory: meta data was changed by TT to fit her story. I'd be willing to bet anything that this happened.
More great news:
Oh I'm certain they will question it. And rightfully so.Wow that is a game changer if it can be shown..so they are protesting the Meta data?
if meta data on phone pics can be easily edited and timestamps on text messages changed, i would protest the crap out of their validityWow that is a game changer if it can be shown..so they are protesting the Meta data?
If I send a text that says EE beat me up last night that is not evidence..... it is an accusationThe only fly in the ointment are the alleged texts sent to her mother.
This is how it will go--- Zeke team will file injunction and it will drag out allowing Zeke to play this season..then next year when court rules procedure was fair and Zeke has to sit out 6 games we will wish we did it this year and not wait...its always about the ammo we got to play with now!!Don't be so sure. They can file at anytime after the appeal hearing and before Henderson rules. They can use what the NFL did in the Brady case as justification for a judge accepting the case and waiting on the ruling. Have no idea if they will try this but it's a possibility.