khiladi;2696695 said:
I don't see much structurally that changed in the offense from 2007-2008 other than the offensive line blocked poorly/was a poor fit and Romo's failed Brady impression. What changed was a lack of discipline overall (Sparano) and some very poor schematic fits in terms of blocking. I would blame Houck just as much as Wilson, but that's another story. Garrett has had his hands in the 2007 offense and 2008. You defend Wilson saying he was here in 2007, but I can counter so was Garrett.
.
I said Wade was here in 2007, because you said Garrett was here. I countered your argument. Further, I stated that teams figured Garrett's passing game out, which you have just corraborated by saying nothing much changed between 2007 and 2008, saying nothing much changed structurally. Garrett never adjusted.
Further, Romo wasn't doing much of a Brady impression because the OL wasn't blocking, and that too primarily because of Garrett's game-planning. The refusal to create a systematic rushing attack with 300 plus OL'me, coupled by the fact the guy had no short passing game and refused to use boot-legs and roll-outs with a QB with amazing legs spelled doom for this offense. You had people like Davis oving ackwards all day trying to pass protect instead of moving forward. Houck doesn't choose the gam-planning as well. Considering Houck's career track-record, even at Miami, showed he made RBs average close to five yards a carry is a stigma on Garrett, not Houck. Romo had to run for his life to keep the plays alive while his WRs were running down-field. As if running for your life won't 'affect' your mechanics.
Brady could sit back in the pocket all day, because they had an amazing short passing game with Wes alker, which kept the LB off the QB. To argue that the Brady impression created an issue with the offense is absurd.