Flamma
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 22,376
- Reaction score
- 19,145
First you proved that you don't know as much as you think you do when you said "many times 42m to keep and 42m to release etc except the 42m to keep also means he is playing that season for the 42m so it is not dead money.". Most people know that it's only counts as dead money if a player is released. Also I forgot to mention that there is a no trade clause so even if the chiefs could find someone willing to pay that kind of money for him the chiefs can't trade him. So the choices are pay him or release him. That means even if Mahomes is playing well but because of having to pay him and they lose other players because of that and are no longer able to get to the Super Bowl, they will have to decide on whether they want to continue to pay that money or go with a younger QB and save 40-50 mil. So the chiefs to start to get better players again may have to get rid of a good QB because of the ultra high cost for him. Once that 3rd day of the new league year is past they are on the hook. What team has stayed relevant for 12 years when one player is using up 20%-25% of their cap space?
.
.
I'm pretty sure this contract was designed with the expectation of the cap continuing to rise. The cap is roughly 200M for 2020. For the next two years his cap hit will not be significant. In 2022 its 31M and 2023 it will hit 42 million. So in 2023 it will be over 20% of today's cap. They're assuming the cap will be higher at that point. The only way he'll be a 20-25% cap hit is if the Salcap flatlines for 12 years.