Cowboysheelsreds053
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 16,979
- Reaction score
- 11,874
If they made 2 offers this past week and neither signed not good. Means they are going to have to up their game.
They do. But have you seen our last three postseason losses. Dak has arguably had the most talent help on offense in the last three years year but you can’t tell. Its one thing to lose but our losses haven’t even been competitive on offenseHe needs a lot of help? They all need a lot of help to win.
I mean not really. A top 10 QB is worth drastically more than any other position. There are maybe 16 franchise level QBs in the NFL and those are the only 16 teams that have a chance to do ANYTHING in the playoffs beyond sneak in and get bounced in the first round. History shows this. Having one of the 16 does not guarantee success but not having one means you wont have that success barring an all time great defense (spoiler those are very rare). You dont need Mahomes, Allen, Burrow, or Lamar, but you do need a franchise level guy. Them being that rare means they get paid like it.I think Dak's market value is $60M/yr and his true value is closer to $30M or $40M.
It's not a Dak thing, it's a QB market thing. I actually like Dak more than most fans here. But QB salaries are out of whack.
Worst type of fanSee ya in 5.
She is a troll.That comment doesn’t make any sense. I’m not going anywhere.
Maximize their worth, or vastly exceed it with unreasonable demands?They’re ridiculous. And it looks like all the NFL players are trying to maximize their worth.
1000% ......I think some look at how Burrow, Stroud and Allen turned their teams from perennial losers to playoff-off contenders. They see the success of Hurts, Tua and Herbert. What they don't seem to understand is every team with a successful franchise QB requires different paths and all come with significant risk. As we all have seen drafting one high reduces your risk a bit but still doesn't offer much guarantee.When you go around the NFL, the favorites in just about every division are teams with the guy at QB and the teams that are expected to do poorly do not have that guy.
Yup.If they sign Dak, it’ll set the franchise back at least 5 years.
It’s a Catch 22. We could go 5 years before we find another QB who can lead us to playoffs .If they sign Dak, it’ll set the franchise back at least 5 years.
I don't see how a two year deal is going to free up cap. There is no room to move the cap hits. You need a longer to deal get that flexibility.did you see what he just signed for last week? It was huge. Dallas nor Dak will not go that route. Both sides will want a short term commitment. Only way I see Dak signing a long deal is if we plan on signing Ceedee and Micah now as well. Signing Dak is key in doing so. It frees up cap.
#LanceIt’s a Catch 22. We could go 5 years before we find another QB who can lead us to playoffs .
Unfortunately we didn’t draft a heir apparent in position to take over now . Or we could have already traded him.
I don’t believe he was brought in to be heir apparent. And he certainly hasn’t shown us enough to move on.#Lance
Talk to Love and Tua, Burrow, Goff, Herbert, Jackson and hurst who all make more than $50 mill APY.Maximize their worth, or vastly exceed it with unreasonable demands?
The final number has been $57-58 for two years. Both sides are just quibbling over a couple million on AAV and probably a bit on guarantees.His true value is over 55.
Value would mean what you bring to the team, he does not bring 1/5th of the team cap in value. I could take that and sign three All Pro OL and line up a lesser QB back there with protection and still make it to the same place in the playoffs, maybe even farther with the improved run game I would get.His true value is over 55.
I think the plan was he could be the heir apparent, but since he hasn't looked very good, from recent reports I've read, they might be rethinking going ahead and re-signing Dak instead.I don’t believe he was brought in to be heir apparent. And he certainly hasn’t shown us enough to move on.
Maybe if your defense could prevent opponent from scoring. If not and you have to come from behind then you have to throw the ball. Especially against the better defenses who’d shut down a one dimensional offense.Value would mean what you bring to the team, he does not bring 1/5th of the team cap in value. I could take that and sign three All Pro OL and line up a lesser QB back there with protection and still make it to the same place in the playoffs, maybe even farther with the improved run game I would get.
I’d argue they brought Lance in as insurance hopeful he might provide more than SF saw. Which as you say isn’t looking good so far as he might not beat out Rush.I think the plan was he could be the heir apparent, but since he hasn't looked very good, from recent reports I've read, they might be rethinking going ahead and re-signing Dak instead.
well that is the case, no matter what his salary is.What matters is that the Cowboys will be stuck with him for at least three or four years.
More of the same.