Are our receivers the issue?

[catiii]

I heard someone mention how they're not getting much separation, well damn, when do the Dallas WR's ever get separation? Have we not assembled the greatest bunch of WR's over the last several years. A cat like Dak, needs guys to be WIDE open to be successful. We need to draft and sign all quick shifty guys that can get open easily

Dak wouldn't SEE them if they WERE wide open. We have some guys like that. Bad scheme from BigMac and inaccurate QB with limited skillset hold them back. We had some wide open last week and they were overthrown badly.

 

[MajesticRey]

its just crazy to me that “receivers not getting open” has been the excuse going on 2 years now.

I find it funny that when the offense look good, you never hear about the receivers being a problem but when we lose and Dak looks bad, you hear the receivers and scheme is bad

*you hear how bad/mid Dak is.

No one blames the receivers except click baiters. Do we have Megatron quality WRs? No, but those aren’t needed if Dak makes more accurate throws.

The reality is Dak isn’t an elite QB and never will be. However, don’t act like people like to shift blame - there are countless threads here pointing out Dak being “the problem”.

 

[Cebrin]

As the week went on, we started to see more and more “analysts” and media members doing “film review”, and a lot of them came away with the notion that are receivers arent winning on the routes and are getting locked down in man coverage.

Ceedee has been getting slandered all week by dudes like Richard Sherman and Dan Orlovsky saying hes not a real number 1.


What do yall think?

SF did very well in coverage, but I saw many big plays left on the field where Dak just overthrew the ball. Personally, the entire team stunk to me. Dak not being able to capitalize on his opportunities certainly didn't help a single bit.