Do you ever have anything meaningful to add to the discussion?
They get you off the field on third and long.
The point is valid, though. When most NFL passing offenses are predicated on getting the ball out in less than three seconds, the effectiveness of a strong pass rush is somewhat nullified.
I expect two Alabama and one Tennessee outside pass rushers to go round one in 2017 so the answer is no.
It has always been Marinelli's theory that the 3-tech DT is more important than the DEs. His scheme made a super star out of Warren Sapp.
If you study the Cowboys DL, you can see that the DEs often sacrifice their chances for pressure because Marinelli is scheming to get the DT freed up to get pressure.
Sure on third and long against a non-mobile QB the DEs get their chance to go all out pass rush; however, if the QB is a threat to run they often play a somewhat contain style even on 3rd and long.
Offenses that use short quick passes eventually have to go to slower longer developing passes on 3rd and long. That is when you have the best chance to get pressure on a QB like Eli; otherwise you need the quick middle pressure to get to him or you need good coverage. LBs have to be good in coverage as well as the DBs.
No.. Miller is a 250lbs outside Linebacker from the 3-4.
You wouldnt put him on the edge in our 4-3 and expect him to rush from our DE position with a hand on the ground.
Obviously good DEs are needed. Marinelli was not the HC or GM. He did make a Pro Bowler out Melton in Chicago.This might be overstated. In Marinelli's time in Tampa as the DL coach, they took passing rushing ends twice in the first round and brought Rice in as well as a FA.
Marinelli might value the 3 Tech but to say that it's more important than the DEs seems odd given the investments the Bucs put into the DE position during Marinelli's time there. And in Chicago, a lot of their pressure came from the outside - Alex Brown, Julius Peppers, Mark Anderson, etc.
Is the 3 Tech important to Marinelli? Sure. But I think people are trying to minimize the role of DEs in Marinelli's system because they are trying to justify how this franchise went about "fixing" an area of weakness that the Jones' very clearly made a priority back in February.
Miller played in a 4-3 until the past 2 or 3 years when Wade became the DC there.No.. Miller is a 250lbs outside Linebacker from the 3-4.
You wouldnt put him on the edge in our 4-3 and expect him to rush from our DE position with a hand on the ground.
Yes and No.In the end, it's still edge pressure. Just in a 3-4, that 4th rushing "DL" is an OLB.
Yes and No.
I believe the OP's original point was to say that the typical DE who lines up and rushes the passer is obsolete.
Maybe he was saying trying to pressure the QB is an obsolete strategy.. No way I am going to try to defend that one if true.
Pressuring the QB is essential. Its awesome if you can find a DE who can just line up and beat his man consistently. But most of the pressure defenses have moved away from trying to find this person and instead rely on scheme to get pressure on the QB.
The beauty in the Denver defense is on any given play the offense doesn't know if Miller or Ware or both are rushing the QB and who is dropping into coverage.
As an OLD. Never as a DE.Miller played in a 4-3 until the past 2 or 3 years when Wade became the DC there.
And yet most of the previous SB winners were very good pass rushing teams.
So no, the effectiveness of a strong pass rush is not even somewhat nullified. It's very important in today's game.
You're not understanding what I'm saying.
On early downs, offenses are looking to get the ball out in three seconds or less. Unless an offensive lineman absolutely whiffs on a block, you're not likely to see much of a pass rush. If you can get some stops and pass break ups on early downs, you can force your opponent into third and long. That's when your pass rush comes into play.
Obviously, 3rd and longs are ideal situations for the defense.
But the original question that was asked is are pass rushing ends obsolete?
The answer is clearly no, they are not.