Are we past the "pinch-me if this is real" phase on Miles?

iceberg;3042920 said:
now look what you did bb.

you got theo and me on the same side...

you're a bad bad bb.

Theo's just a stalkerish contrarian. One of those guys in love with the sound of his own voice. The last guy you'd want to corner you at a party. It's my fault for arguing with [strike]sellouts and Jerry enablers[/strike] season-ticket holders, who tend to defend the team to the bitter end in order to justify their investment.
 
SilverStarCowboy;3042931 said:
I heard you got the first phone call when they started giving out trophies for density

yea, but it's my density that brought me to you.
 
bbgun;3042932 said:
Theo's just a stalkerish contrarian. One of those guys in love woth the sound of his own voice. It's my fault for arguing with [strike]sellouts and Jerry enablers[/strike] season-ticket holders, who tend to defend the team to the bitter end in order to justify their investment.

who's defending the team?

we've been raggin on you and you done went and moved the goalposts again.

quick, blame me - it's a HELL of a diversion!
 
iceberg;3042936 said:
who's defending the team?

we've been raggin on you and you done went and moved the goalposts again.

quick, blame me - it's a HELL of a diversion!

You moved them by invoking Theo's name. Try to keep up.
 
bbgun;3042937 said:
You moved them by invoking Theo's name. Try to keep up.

just cause he and i both noticed you take vast leeway with people's "quotes" doesn't mean i moved a thing.

i just didn't follow along this fun little path of stupidity you were dancing down.
 
bbgun;3042924 said:
Not even close, but thanks for the unsolicited snark as always.

"Me and my shadow ..."
Uh....pretty sure I've been in this conversation for a while now.

And yes, they're the same thing. I'm sure you'd like them not to be, but too bad.
 
bbgun;3042616 said:
Correct. He overreacted. I win. Yay.



You said:

You're gonna have to start naming these "alleged" fans who want Tony cut or benched. Something tells me I can count them on one hand, which means you're being needlessly hysterical.

You said:

And the fact that you do so on a virulent pro-Tony board, where you have an army of his supporters to back you up, is hardly the definition of "courage." In fact, it's just the opposite.

So the insinuation is that if I went to a different board it would take courage to support Romo the third highest rated QB in NFL history.

Thanks for proving my point. People are so anti Romo that it would take courage to be a Romo fan.

Like I said...people will turn on Austin. Thanks for proving my point.

You said:

Yes, guilty as charged. Anyone with two brain cells to rub together would arrive at the exact same conclusion. Anyone with a third grade education or higher can clearly see what he was implying. Despite the other QBs' fine qualities, he'd rather stick with Tony. Logical conclusion: no trade. Are you under the impression that he had to explicitly write "I wouldn't trade Tony for any other QB in the league"? Absurd. Keep moving those goal posts 'til you win.

So you get to imply what other posters were saying, but I can't. A guy can say Romo sucks, choker, never win with the guy, and blah blah blah, but I can't assume he wants the guy cut or wants him gone. Ok. If you get those powers I guess you win.
 
gbrittain;3043048 said:
So the insinuation is that if I went to a different board it would take courage to support Romo the third highest rated QB in NFL history.

Depends on how far you took it. And no one cares that he's the "third highest rated QB in NFL history," just like no one cares that Roy had a big season in Detroit three years ago. Hell, I'll bet that even Tony doesn't know his own personal milestones. That crap is for Rotisserie geeks anyway.

Thanks for proving my point. People are so anti Romo that it would take courage to be a Romo fan.

Can you read? Around here, it would take courage to knock him. Just like it would take courage to stroll over to DCC and praise Jerry. Like most cowards, you clearly prefer safety in numbers. You couldn't find any "cut Tony" heretics, so you had to invent them. Fail.

Like I said...people will turn on Austin. Thanks for proving my point.

Even if they do, so what? They don't need your blessings. If you can overpraise, they can "turn."

So you get to imply what other posters were saying, but I can't. A guy can say Romo sucks, choker, never win with the guy, and blah blah blah, but I can't assume he wants the guy cut or wants him gone. Ok. If you get those powers I guess you win.

You got caught telling a whopper and I called you on it, repeatedly. Sucks to be you.
 
bbgun;3043074 said:
You got caught telling a whopper and I called you on it, repeatedly. Sucks to be you.

so why is it ok for you to do what you "attack" others for doing?

you did the exact same thing and 3 people have called you on it and all you do is dig the stupidity ditch a little deeper.
 
bbgun;3043074 said:
Depends on how far you took it. And no one cares that he's the "third highest rated QB in NFL history," just like no one cares that Roy had a big season in Detroit three years ago. Hell, I'll bet that even Tony doesn't know his own personal milestones. That crap is for Rotisserie geeks anyway.



Can you read? Around here, it would take courage to knock him. Just like it would take courage to stroll over to DCC and praise Jerry. Like most cowards, you clearly prefer safety in numbers. You couldn't find any "cut Tony" heretics, so you had to invent them. Fail.



Even if they do, so what? They don't need your blessings. If you can overpraise, they can "turn."



You got caught telling a whopper and I called you on it, repeatedly. Sucks to be you.

So I'm a coward because I support Romo on this board. I have been on this board before Romo was a Cowboy.

Earlier you called me thin skinned and now you are calling me a liar and a coward. I see personal insults is where you go when you got nothing else.

I tried having a honest debate with you but it was for not. In retrospect I wish I knew the rules of the debate. I cannot read into what others are saying when they bash Romo mercilessly, but you can read into what others are saying that support Romo. And for this I have become a thin skinned lying coward.

I haven't always agreed with you bbgun, but I thought you were better than this.

You have certainly attacked me on a personal level more than I have ever attacked someone over their opinion.
 
gbrittain;3043093 said:
So I'm a coward because I support Romo on this board. I have been on this board before Romo was a Cowboy.

Earlier you called me thin skinned and now you are calling me a liar and a coward. I see personal insults is where you go when you got nothing else.

I tried having a honest debate with you but it was for not. In retrospect I wish I knew the rules of the debate. I cannot read into what others are saying when they bash Romo mercilessly, but you can read into what others are saying that support Romo. And for this I have become a thin skinned lying coward.

I haven't always agreed with you bbgun, but I thought you were better than this.

You have certainly attacked me on a personal level more than I have ever attacked someone over their opinion.

Give it a rest. I'm attacking your behavior in this thread, not "personal" things like your religion, family, race, looks, politics, sexual orientation, etc. Nor am I inclined to take lectures in civility from someone who traffics in words like "haters "and "idiots." You knew that you could cast Tony as the victim of a bogus hate campaign knowing that the usual suspects would come running to the rescue if someone called you on your bullcrap, and darned if that isn't exactly what happened. Courage like yours only comes along once in a generation. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if the Prez pinned a medal on your chest sometime in the near future.
 
iceberg;3043092 said:
so why is it ok for you to do what you "attack" others for doing?

you did the exact same thing and 3 people have called you on it and all you do is dig the stupidity ditch a little deeper.
*crickets*
 
theogt;3043142 said:
*crickets*

You must be referring to your MIA status after the Denver loss. Typical behavior of a sunshine patriot. When the going gets tough, Theo gets going.

BTW, I'm somehow obligated to respond to every crackpot post? News to me.
 
bbgun;3043153 said:
You must be referring to your MIA status after the Denver loss. Typical behavior of a sunshine patriot. When the going gets tough, Theo gets going.

BTW, I'm somehow obligated to respond to every crackpot post? News to me.
I've already told you I was out of town that Sunday and Monday.
 
theogt;3043166 said:
I've already told you I was out of town that Sunday and Monday.

Now you just have to account for the five other days. OTOH, the rest us are here rain or shine. I guess we have more "courage."
 
bbgun;3043170 said:
Now you just have to account for the five other days. OTOH, the rest us are here rain or shine. I guess we have more "courage."
Some of us. But you're not. Once someone makes a point you don't like in a thread you disappear.

Hence, "*crickets*."
 
theogt;3043172 said:
Some of us. But you're not. Once someone makes a point you don't like in a thread you disappear.

Hence, "*crickets*."

I disappeared? When? Hell, I never left. I ignored Ice's post for the same reason I ignored the "start Kitna" threads: they had no merit. The only white flag around here is you after a loss.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
465,917
Messages
13,905,044
Members
23,793
Latest member
Roger33
Back
Top