TheMarathonContinues
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 84,316
- Reaction score
- 76,895
Look at this poll and the previous one posted.....same votes lol. Well the same "no's" anyway.It shows how people like to flip-flop based off of results, good or bad.
Look at this poll and the previous one posted.....same votes lol. Well the same "no's" anyway.It shows how people like to flip-flop based off of results, good or bad.
A lot of those members analysis on Dak is "he sucks" lol. A lot of those guys have already come out and said they hold a grudge against him for personal reasons mainly being he took Romo's job and they blame him. Some of them are also Wentz/Eagles fans.The 'No' group is usually full of members simply wanting
to advance further than last season. Nearly all of them
actually make that statement.
How about compared to the first poll after the loss to SF?Look at this poll and the previous one posted.....same votes lol. Well the same "no's" anyway.
@Risen is the only one of thoseA lot of those members analysis on Dak is "he sucks" lol. A lot of those guys have already come out and said they hold a grudge against him for personal reasons mainly being he took Romo's job and they blame him. Some of them are also Wentz/Eagles fans.
He ain't the only one that's for sure.@Risen is the only one of those
Not sure about that one. I'm sure there was a lot less "Yes" votes.How about compared to the first poll after the loss to SF?
And what are we going to do with the information?It's clearly explained in the OP.
"to gauge how everyone is feeling about various aspects of the team."
And if he does not win a ring, a certain group of this fanbase would still shine his shoes for not winning a ring. Don't forget, that coin has two sides on it.I mean let's don't kid ourselves. Dak could win a ring and a certain group of this fanbase would still dsicredit him.
Yes it is...flip that coin.It doesn't though lol. Its actually very informative.
What it says and what it does are two different things.
You know who to complain to about this.All it does is cause more drama.
"Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain."...lolYou know who to complain to about this.
I mean isn't that what you should do? If he plays well he should get his proper respect. If he plays poorly he should be held accountable for it.And if he does not win a ring, a certain group of this fanbase would still shine his shoes for not winning a ring. Don't forget, that coin has two sides on it.
Not even close. That first poll, if I remember correctly, was something like 85% no to 15% yes. The next time Dallas won it flip flopped a great deal. People were voting simply on their week-to-week emotions. I voted no then, and I voted no every other time after that. He needs to prove he can get the job done in the post season, only then will I consider changing my vote.Not sure about that one. I'm sure there was a lot less "Yes" votes.
The actual answer to this is that it is incredibly stupid to change your opinion about anything based upon a single game sample size.If a loss against the Packers would make you change your mind on McCarthy, why cant we reserve our right to change our mind with Dak once he gets us to the championship game?
Shhhh...You sure about that? I didn't see it after the losses to Buffalo and Miami