khiladi;1936131 said:
Neither was Arthur ANderson and Enron...
I can see why you have a problem with sequential logic. You are good at segregating arguments from a context.
First, Enron and Arthur Anderson were involved in defrauding investors and stockholders, which is illegal.
Please show me where video taping game signals is illegal?
Second, my comments came within a context that you conveniently omitted, namely ...
Tyke1doe said:
First, there is a difference between destroying government documents and destroying personal or private documents. And last time I checked, the NFL wasn't a governmental entity.
Second, destruction of document only has application if a legal investigation has been initiated. Then if one destroys documents critical to an investigation, it becomes a criminal matter. Godell's actions had nothing to do with a criminal or civil investigation.
Third, Specter's comments make little sense because banks and corporations destroy records all the time. The only time it would become an issue is if the companies were notified of an investigation and were specifically told not to destroy evidence crucial to that investigation.
Here's a point of logic for you:
One must not separate a point from the broader context unless that context does not apply.
Hence, it's okay to shred private and personal documents -
UNLESS, one has been informed not to do so because of a pending legal investigation, as my Point 3 indicates.