EMMITTnROY
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 4,068
- Reaction score
- 6,597
Zeke’s leverage ⬆️
Dak’s leverage ⬆️
Cowboys leverage ⬇️
Amari’s leverage ↔️
Dak’s leverage ⬆️
Cowboys leverage ⬇️
Amari’s leverage ↔️
which arrow points exit ?
garrett needs one of those .
Mike Weber: 6 for 18How did this game give Zeke leverage? He still has two years left on his contract.
Did any of those numbers change Zeke's contractMike Weber: 6 for 18
Tony Pollard: 4 for 16
Darius Jackson: 6 for 16
Cowboys: 0 TDs
Why would Dak's leverage go up? Because our backups stink? Well he couldn't get us in the EZ either.
Even if he didn't have 2 years left, this game gave him exactly what he already has - no leverage.How did this game give Zeke leverage? He still has two years left on his contract.
Kap threw for a total of 4 yards thru three quarters the game he was benched for Blaine gabbert. He sucks. If he was a good player that could help a team win he would be on a roster. Teams really dont care what kind of person you are if you are a stud on the field.And Cooper Rush is a better option than Kapernick?
For a moderator I am surprised you actually think a player who is considered the best at his position in the league has no leverage just on withholding his skills from the team.Even if he didn't have 2 years left, this game gave him exactly what he already has - no leverage.
which arrow points exit ?
garrett needs one of those .
Kap threw for a total of 4 yards thru three quarters the game he was benched for Blaine gabbert. He sucks. If he was a good player that could help a team win he would be on a roster. Teams really dont care what kind of person you are if you are a stud on the field.
Kap may be better than a lot of scrub QBs out there, but the bottom line is he is simply not good enough to warrant signing. Plus, he wants way more money than anyone wants to pay a backup. You can deal with distractions to a certain extent, but what's the point if the player in no way will help you win games.