No, I am talking about in his heyday. Teams ran at him all the time and gained decent yardage on the Bills.
Was Bruce Smith therefore a bust? By the rationale heretofore in this thread he was.
What about Deion Sanders? The book on him was to throw to someone or run the ball in the zoen underneath his coverage and make him have to tackle. Teams did it with some success. Was he therefore a bust?
If you cannot legitimately call those guys busts then your arguments for why teams attack Roy deep hold no water. They do it because that is the book on him. It does not make him a bust or a bad player.
I hate the Pro Bowl, but this guy goes every year and 2/3 of the votes needed to send him are players and coaches. They obviously don't think he's a bust. Why do some of you think that? It is beyond me.
Mel Renfro brought up a way to help Roy work on his weakest point. I don't disagree with him one iota. I'd love to see someone really figure out how to fix this in Roy. Mel Renfro did not however say "Roy's a bust." You'd never know he didn't say that from the harping about it.
Darren Woodson (quoted in this thead) praised Roy to know end. Hushed right over. Ignore Darren Woodson, but by all means look what Mel said. The only problem is it's a distortion of what he said. Read the initial post. he did not say the guy is a bad football player by any wild stretch.
Like I said, read every game thread this season and read these threads closer. You may not be saying "Roy sucks," but others damn sure are and they have no idea what they are talking about and Adam keeps blowing it out of the water.
Hells bells man, 3 of us who played college football described coverage schemes in depth a week or so ago and no one paid the least bit of attention. Parcells praising Roy or removing liability from him is a lie, but he criticizes him in one comment and it's gospel truth. Wade Phillips lies about him and covers for him.
You don't think these things aren't just a little bit hypocritical? Seriously?
Come on.