No he hasn't. The minute the final gun sounds in the game if the Cowboys won and Dak was the QB that team they beat is automatically reclassified as a bad team. Them's the rules of the game these people like to play. Either adher to them or you will be banned from posting!
I'm not an apologist and believe Dak has to play better, but when you are one dimensional and always behind the scoreboard cause your defense can stop anyone, no team is going to be successful. Just look at the Chiefs, Mahomes hasn't played great this year, yes, some due to injuries, but he has leaned on their defense and strong rushing attack in which they have yet to lose a game.
It's my fervent hope that the monies yet to be allocated from the NFL will suffice, when added to the amount already present.
the problem with this logic is the last 28 years show a much deeper problem that no one player is gonna fix..how many times does this fan base need to see it...Dak is not the answer because there is NO QB THAT IS THE ANSWER...until this FO changes how it builds a team you will be continually asking for a "Better Answer" when the problem is there is no such player who can fix this...for 28 years this FO's teams have been shown the door in crunch time because it always has a fatal flaw.they have had 2 QB's in 20 years who clearly have ability, if you choose to think they are the problem and ignore the FO then the problem will always be the QB.
Scroll up to dude's characterization of the wins against Philly two years ago. He bent over backwards to splain it away.
Oh...one game two years ago. Got it!
We're not always behind the scorecard just because of the defense.
Hey, the Cowboy beat the Bucs so bad that Brady had to retire in shame. Dak is way better than Brady and that game proves it, huh Dak fans.
Now that is a reply that is...
No hard feelings here either.
They are -66 at home and have gotten blown out each time!
Maybe not heavily but if I'm not mistaken they WERE favored weren't they? No one is saying they were the better team, but it was in fact a playoff win which by definition took place against a playoff team. What about the Lions last year? They stopped being a good team for one Sunday (when they played the Cowboys) and then turned back into a good team on the Monday after the game right? Or did the conversion occur immediately after the final gun sounded? You tell ME?
If a team beating the Cowboys proves their QB is better than Dak (as has been argued here ad nauseum) then yes.. the rules have to be applied consistently.
So I guess you agree that Dak is better than Brady?
You know I live here....and everyone HERE ...no not favored and in fact know an 8-9 playoff team sucks.
Nope... I just think that if people want to use that logic to declare opposing QBs better than Dak when the Cowboys lose then they should be prepared to accept the same logic when the Cowboys win.
I looked it up.. the game time spread had the Cowboys -2.5. I think that means the Cowboys were the favorites against Tampa. But you didn't address Detroit. Were they a good team before they lost to the Cowboys, morphed into a bad team that Sunday, then went back to being a good team on Monday after the game or not?You know I live here....and everyone HERE ...no not favored and in fact know an 8-9 playoff team sucks.
At best? Well its Brady anything could happen. Realistically....that was a retired, unretired, lost guru head coach, scandal divorce aging qb who then retired again.
Surely a recipe for success and being favored.
That's not true everywhere but it's certainly true in dallas
When is the last time a player got the bag in Dallas and still performed at that level? Maybe DLaw, Zack Martin? Certainly no skill positions though.
