robbieruff
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 3,709
- Reaction score
- 5,108
This isn't really a decision for me. I'm fine that they kept Cole. I would have been fine if they kept Dwayne. Instead what I'm seeing is that both are C+ to B- talents who are elevated to B's and B+'s based on who the QB is. Cole's play is elevated when Romo is the QB. Harris's is elevated when Eli is the QB. You think Dwayne still gets 2 TDs today with Ryan Nassib? I really think there is no hindsight here to speak of.
There's no question that who is throwing to them makes all the difference in the world in terms of production (I wrote later in this thread that Cole gets a pass until we have a healthy Romo...right now it is not a very fair comparison)...but I wasn't really just comparing the two but also wondering why it is that our young players (particularly at the skilled positions) seem to "blow up" relatively speaking when they get to a new environment. Harris and Bennett come to mind, as do players like Andre Holmes with the Raiders (remember him?)...I am not saying you have to be right on EVERYONE you release (I understand why we let dudes like Jimmy Smith get away or even a Danny Amendola back in the day). Heck, maybe part of the problem is a luxury of riches...when you have dominant starters (e.g., Witten and Dez or Irvin years ago) other players just don't get the reps to develop and/or show their stuff. It just seems puzzling to me that dudes that "can't break through" here in recent years, especially, go off and become very productive players on other teams while other teams can just plug in somebody it seems (e.g., Green Bay WRs) and they produce at a pretty good level. Makes you wonder about coaching, of course...but is there some other factors at play as well?