CWR
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 25,219
- Reaction score
- 36,771
Especially when that arm is smashing your face to the point there isn't any else Bell could have grabbed to bring him down.
It was actually one hell of a tackle. Bell is a stud.
Especially when that arm is smashing your face to the point there isn't any else Bell could have grabbed to bring him down.
Correct.Stiff arm is legal as long as the arm is simply extended to avoid the tackle. What they banned was the punches to the face that some of the ball carriers were doing to avoid being tackled.
Because it’s not a foul.Correct.
Frustrating how the referees are not calling them stiff-arm punches to the face as fouls as they should.
Forget the Goedert tackle video, does anyone have video of Eagles fans losing their minds over the takedown?
I don’t feel it was dirty or malicious by Bell. Just unfortunate.Not dirty. Smaller guy tackling a bigger guy and the takedown was a combination of body positioning and physics.
Had Goedert not extended his arm, he wouldn’t have broken it— bad luck for him, pure and simple.
It's supposed to be a foul. You can't punch someone in the facemask as a means of stiff-arming. A stiff-arm is perfectly legal as long as the ball carrier doesn't deliver a blow with his open/closed hand when using the stiff arm and doesn't grasp the defender's facemask.Because it’s not a foul.
Too fast to be dirty.
It's human nature for them to be calling this dirty.....just like everyone in here was complaining about SanFran hurting Tony Pollard last year by drop tackling him ....which is also not an illegal tackle.
So the eagle site is wrong....but everyone in here was whining just like them last year with Pollard....so a bit hypocritical
Everything looks worse in slo mo . . . like the TD/no TD by Schoon and the lack of a DPI call. Bang-bang plays!Man that looks a lot worse in slow motion. I hope he recovers soon.
I felt like posting MORE than my first 5 words. That's what this board is about...expressing ur opinions. I'm not whining about anything....just explaining how people could let their emotions lead them to come to a wrong conclusion ...just like many people in here did about Pollard. It's called relating to past experiences, to understand what's being said now.I didn't post this for supposed Cowboy fans to come in here and attack their fellow Cowboy fans. That is not what this post is about. Just an FYI !
Your first 5 words of your post was sufficient to respond to my OP. I mean, your whining about Cowboy fans is pretty much over the top and really not needed if you are truly against whining. So, who is hypocritical? Reminds me of my ex digging up crap from the past. She had weak character !