the kid 05
Individuals play the game, but teams beat the odds
- Messages
- 9,543
- Reaction score
- 3
flipped a coin between Staubach and Aikman and it landed on the designated side for Staubach so he wins
Doomsday101;1436232 said:I enjoyed watching Roger as well and think he is one of the all time greats. So is Troy Aikman and in my opinion it was not just the fact he helped the team to 3 SB but his pure abilities at the position. I have also seen Great QB's on bad teams that hurt their winning percentage but none the less the QB's skills showed up. A QB can only do so much, he has no control over special teams or defense and both of those areas of a team contribute to winning and losing.
ABQCOWBOY;1436278 said:A good team can loss with a bad QB consistantly. An average team can win with a great QB, consistantly. It is the most important position on the field. You can not afford to live with bad QB play if you want to win IMO. This is why I am such an advocate of quality QBs above all else. I saw both of them play and I cast my vote on Roger. Aikman was great. He had exceptional skills in certain areas but, Roger had that one thing that makes teams better then they are IMO. He could make players believe. To me, that seperates the two. It is only my opinion but it's what I belief.
ELDudearino;1436253 said:Who actually won more games overall??
tomson75;1436246 said:You mean like when someone says that Troy Smth will be a better pro QB than Beady Quinn?
If I was stating it as a fact, I would have prefaced it as such. I would not have then gone on to put IMO at the end of my post either.
Roger's teams were not nearly as dominant for their times period as Troy's were IMO. I simply believe that those 70's teams owed a larger part of their success to Roger than the 90's teams owed to Troy. That is all. You're right though...there is no right or wrong answer. I love them both as well.
Crown Royal;1436768 said:Lot's of old people in this thread.
Statistically Danny White was one of the best QB's in club history and led the Cowboys to 3 consecutive NFC Title games. Had the ball bounced his way in just one of those 3 games he would in all likelihood have also won a Superbowl, and would most likely be in the HOF. He would have more than 2 votes and you would not be laughing but for one or two plays going the wrong way for him. The difference between Danny White our forgotten (almost) hero and Steve Young the 49ers HOF QB is that the ball DID bounce Young’s way in ONE game.big dog cowboy;1436641 said:Danny White got 2 votes?
Chocolate Lab;1436925 said:Like ABQ said, I don't feel qualified to vote because I never saw Meredith play. But many people whose opinion I respect say he was better than even Staubach and Aikman.
Maybe that's good because I can't decide between Roger and Troy. IMO Aikman is very underrated by many people today, but I'm still not sure he was better than Staubach. I guess if you really put a gun to my head I'd go with Staubach, but boy is it close.
And hey, taps-n-1... I was thinking about a Dorsett vs. Emmitt poll tomorrow. Whaddya think?
joseephuss;1437126 said:I believe Bob Hayes was quoted as saying that if Meredith had not retired so early, no one would have heard of Roger Staubach. Something to that effect.