Video: Blandino tells officials only the Dallas coaches don't understand the catch rule

[BubbleScreen]

Of all the BS calls I've seen, the only one that makes me angrier is the non-PI call on Deion vs #88 in the end zone in the 94 NFCCG.

 

[SultanOfSix]

Blamdumbo will never admit that that Dallas Cowboys got hosed with one of the most atrocious reversals in the history of the game. He and his mob bosses must have had a whole lot of money riding on the game.

 

[DogFace]

**** him

 

[Kaiser]

Of all the BS calls I've seen, the only one that makes me angrier is the non-PI call on Deion vs #88 in the end zone in the 94 NFCCG.

But at least there was an excuse for that call, Deion was smart enough to do it when the official was screened from viewing it and we didn't have instant replay at the time.

The Dez catch was purely a matter of the league giving a political answer to yes or no question.

 

[CT Dal Fan]

Blamdumbo will never admit that that Dallas Cowboys got hosed with one of the most atrocious reversals in the history of the game. He and his mob bosses must have had a whole lot of money riding on the game.

Actually, I think the Dez catch reversal was the NFL's attempt to "make right" the non-pass interference call on linebacker Anthony Hitchins the week before against the Lions. Two wrongs make a right in Blandino's world.

However, few recall the Lions were still winning at the time and still had several chances to stop the Cowboys or score. They did not. Against Green Bay, it was Dallas that was behind. Even though four minutes remained, we were all robbed of seeing what would have happened if the Cowboys took the lead in that game.

 

[Primetime42]

That's it, he's banned from the bus.

 

[ElGatoGrande]

Hoping this guy has a very public "Ray Rice" moment soon,,,

 

[SultanOfSix]

Actually, I think the Dez catch reversal was the NFL's attempt to "make right" the non-pass interference call on linebacker Anthony Hitchins the week before against the Lions. Two wrongs make a right in Blandino's world.

However, few recall the Lions were still winning at the time and still had several chances to stop the Cowboys or score. They did not. Against Green Bay, it was Dallas that was behind. Even though four minutes remained, we were all robbed of seeing what would have happened if the Cowboys took the lead in that game.

I think you're right. The problem is it's an atrocious rationalization, which is unsurprising since it comes from Blandumbo, because of two reasons. 1) You should never care what the fan reaction is. A ref's job is to call the game as fairly as possible. Mistakes happen, but no amount of "fixing" in a game after the fact will correct a mistake in a previous game. 2) The plays in the Detroit and the Green Bay game aren't remotely comparable. In the Detroit game, both players were at least equally guilty of infractions, and this has already been discussed her ad nauseam to evidence this fact. Dez's play was a fantastic individual play that was called correctly on the field and overturned without a shred of conclusive evidence. Zilch. Nada.

And like you said, the thing that is most egregious is the reffing took it out of the hands of the players in the Green Bay game. The game is about players making plays and Tony and Dez did that and they got it "voided" because Blandumbo had to overrule an obvious catch because of some bogus and unjustified interpretation of a rule that was specious then and is still specious now. Heck, the Cowboys still weren't even guaranteed to score a TD even if Dez's catch wasn't overturned. Murray could have fumbled or anything could have happened. And even if the Cowboys did score, like in the Detroit game, it wasn't over and Green Bay still had plenty of opportunity to score a TD, or the Cowboys could have stopped them, but we'll never know because of Blandumbo.

 

[iceberg]

To complete the catch process, the new rule for 2016 (same as the 2014 rule) states that a receiver must have control + two feet + time enough for a football move. Yesterday at the annual NFL Officiating Clinic, Senior VP of Officiating Dean Blandino spoke to the league's 124 officials about the catch rule, among other topics. It's important to add that this meeting was held in Dallas, Texas.

Blandino: "Control plus two feet plus time. And the time element, in the exercise we've done with all the coaches -- I know I've had them, and the other guys that have done this meeting with the coaches --we've had this 'Aha!' moment in the meetings with the coaching staffs, except for this one staff that is near here...um, in this city...But, this 'Aha!' moment, 'Oh, we get it now. We understand.'"

That's the transcript. To hear it for yourself, go to 1:30 of the video.

if there wasn't an issue about it being understood, then they would have gotten it right to begin with, not have had to overturn it.

outside this - give it some time. they'll change the rule again for whatever them happy. his dig seems to make this personal which i'd rather not see out of *ANY* ref.

 

[Seven]

Why does this idiot still have a job?

Why is he robbing us of oxygen?

 

[Seven]

He needs to be fired

He needs to be transported in a port-a-potty, to the middle of nowhere, turn it upside down and then set it on fire.

 

[bevo11]

He wants to be someone and the only way he gets air time is by discussing the Cowboys.

 

[Everson24]

The call on the field was a catch...it shouldn't have been overturned. Had they called it incomplete on the field there would not have been irrefutable evidence to overturn that call either.

This has been my gripe all along. Side judge Terry Brown ruled that he had possesion and made a football move before the ball came out.

The officals had been instructed prior to the 2014 season to let the ruling on the field stand unless the replay showed irrefutable evidence to the contrary. Dean Blandino had no right to overturn the call on the field from an office in New York when the"football move" was clearly a judgement call. This issue seems to be swept under the carpet in this whole scenario and I really wish someone would ask Blandino that question.

 

[DogFace]

He needs to be transported in a port-a-potty, to the middle of nowhere, turn it upside down and then set it on fire.

Seems a little extrem but, you've put a lot of thought into this detailed plan so I'll go with it.

 

[dcjules]

Said the man with no officiating experience...

The 42-year-old Blandino has never officiated a game. A 1994 graduate of Hofstra University on Long Island, he used to play pickup basketball with Jets players whose training base was at the school. He joined the NFL's officiating department in 1994 as an intern, working under Jerry Seeman, the longtime head of officials.

explains it all....worked under a "head of Seeman".....

 

[DallasEast]

That is like a nurse telling a surgeon that he doesn't know how to remove a gallbladder

At the very least, the average nursing graduate alone can identify the location of the gallbladder, explain the organ's function within the body, etc. What's Blandino's excuse for continually flunking Refereeing 101?

 

[LandryFan]

I'm glad someone mentioned that Cobb bs catch that obviously hit the ground, I'm still heated over that

But he didn't have "indisputable" evidence on the Cobb "catch". However, he did have indisputable evidence that Dez didn't make a football move to complete the catch process.
You simply can't make this **** up.

 

[TellerMorrow34]

And as per usual Blandino opens I mouth and shows the world how clueless and stupid he really is.

 

[LandryFan]

To complete the catch process, the new rule for 2016 (same as the 2014 rule) states that a receiver must have control + two feet + time enough for a football move. Yesterday at the annual NFL Officiating Clinic, Senior VP of Officiating Dean Blandino spoke to the league's 124 officials about the catch rule, among other topics. It's important to add that this meeting was held in Dallas, Texas.

Blandino: "Control plus two feet plus time. And the time element, in the exercise we've done with all the coaches -- I know I've had them, and the other guys that have done this meeting with the coaches --we've had this 'Aha!' moment in the meetings with the coaching staffs, except for this one staff that is near here...um, in this city...But, this 'Aha!' moment, 'Oh, we get it now. We understand.'"

That's the transcript. To hear it for yourself, go to 1:30 of the video.

 

[LandryFan]

This has been my gripe all along. Side judge Terry Brown ruled that he had possesion and made a football move before the ball came out.

The officals had been instructed prior to the 2014 season to let the ruling on the field stand unless the replay showed irrefutable evidence to the contrary. Dean Blandino had no right to overturn the call on the field from an office in New York when the"football move" was clearly a judgement call. This issue seems to be swept under the carpet in this whole scenario and I really wish someone would ask Blandino that question.

That is the exact stance I have always taken on this. Nobody in the press is has ever asked the right question. I sure wish someone would, but I think the train has left the station on that one.