I have yet to see one objective or even coherent view on why Bledsoe is better than McNabb. Not a single person has brought both sides of why each quarterback has his own strengths and weaknesses and then decided on who was better. Instead I've seen numerous posters even admit they voted for Bledsoe just because he plays for their team. That is being a homer, period.
I'm not trolling when I stated an obvious fact, one that the more sensible cowboys fans here have even noted on in this very thread. McNabb is a much better quarterback than Bledsoe. Having the majority of the boards members state otherwise without coming up with any type of logical argument beyond overstating the value of leadership, and the records of each player in the AFC Championship and Superbowl.
What is lost on those ridiculous arguments is the fact that Bledsoe hasn't made it to a conference championship, something McNabb has
4 times, in a decade. Why even bring up the Superbowl when neither quarterback has won one.

Just illogical.