Dak is a really good and promising QB for the future no doubt but I will have to disagree that Dak is better fundamentally than Romo, if Romo was the same age as Dak now 23, with the same skill players on the team now I would take a young Romo over Dak every week and wouldn't think twice about it. I will say Dak does have better fundamentals than all the rookie QBs taken before him in this draft.
Dak is playing very efficiently and that is all anyone could ask for especially given he's a rookie but sometimes some fans amaze me with their comments so now 6 games into his young career he's a better QB than Tony, as you mentioned Dak is making safer reads with the football and Tony is in a totally different stratosphere when it comes to what defenses are doing even though Dak, is learning this part of the game. Some fans don't want to admit this but at some point this season Romo, will be on the field and he does open up the offense a lot more with his experience in this scheme and for those who say that Romo will mess up the "team chemistry" need to realize it wasn't Romo's injury that forced Dak into the starting role it was actually Moore's injury that has Dak starting. So iow Moore would now be the starting QB had it not been for his leg injury in TC, the question is would the team be 5-1 with Moore?, that would be a resounding no and those same fans who is hollering "team chemistry" would be begging for Tony's return. This is not a shot at Dak he is doing a phenomenal job at QB and looking forward to the future of the franchise with him as starter and for those fans and those in the media alike who wants to see Romo, traded after this season it won't happen he will be here for at least another year or two before they decide what to do with his contract and that is why we're fans on the outside looking in because we truly don't know how important an asset a person could be take Leary for example most fans wanted him gone and now "sign him to a contract because he's better than Collins" in the end we as fans have to be careful in saying who we want gone because whether they like or not Romo is a huge asset to the team's success.
Of course Erod anyone who is QB for the Dallas Cowboys, will get the same treatment all of the other QBs before him Prescott just got a small taste from Davis of what's to come from media prognosticators and fans alike as they say the Cowboys are huge ratings.
plasticman with the strawman comments.
I'm not sure where you're coming from with this. Dak has had almost universal praise showered on him since he became the starter. It's been refreshing to see a Cowboys QB get this much love again.
No doubt SD he's been getting his fair share of praise by the media what I meant was that playing QB for the Cowboys is the most scrutinized position in the world of sports and he will get his fair and unfair share of criticism as well.
That is the best part about this whole thing is if Romo gets in and is not the same guy as 2014 in which I don't expect him to be because each year is different if he comes in and be the Romo we expect him to be then Dak can sit and learn and grow into a even more polished QB, and if he's a shell of his former self and is turning the ball over frequently then they can go right back to Dak as we know having 2 good QBs is a nice problem to have.
I guess Reality is going to have to create a "Most Tactful Poster" award now that you're here, Trouty.
Wow so that was a bad read by Tony in that situation to throw that pass to Dez iirc Tony, after they were robbed of that play explained on a radio show that due to the defensive alignment that the Pack was in that took away anything underneath so he read what they were doing and Dez at the moment was the right read and he wasn't even the first read on that play it is how the Packers played coverage dictated where Tony threw the ball so Dez 1 on 1 with Shields was the ideal read in that situation don't understand your logic about Tony making a bad decision that day because it was not.
