Brad Sham said after a second look he was positive the kick was no good

[Boysboy]

Not blaming the loss on the refs, but if true, wow...

Sorry-it wasn't the refs' fault Garrett went pass-happy. It wasn't the refs' fault that our run D sucked wind.

Don't worry, we'll be fine. It's only week 4.

 

[juck]

It was missed from the view on tv,unless it hooked it and i missed it,I cant believe they would see that though.

 

[Beast_from_East]

it looked out to me.

I looked at the kick again and it looks like it was outside the goal post, it really does look no good.

However, the angle could be an optical illusion since the camera is positioned to the side and not directly behind the post.

Like others, I am not going to blame officiating for this loss. the fact that our D, loaded with 1st rounders and high-priced free agents, let the Skins drive the lenght of the field at the very end of the game is why we lost.

Translation: The defense blows, even if the ref screwed up the FG.

 

[skinsngibbs4life]

Not reviewable (as per The Ticket).

I thought they changed the rule after that field goal earlier this year that was contraversial (cleveland game?)?

 

[Sarge]

Can you challenge a field goal?

No - you can't.

 

[juck]

If he missed it then the media should be all over this,unless mr vegas said shhhhhhh

 

[Beast_from_East]

I thought they changed the rule after that field goal earlier this year that was contraversial (cleveland game?)?

I think you can review if it bounces in our not, like the Clevland kick hit the crossbar and bounced out.

However, I dont think you can challenge a judgement call if a kick is good or not. At least I have never seen it done in either the college or pro ranks.

 

[BlueStar22]

I was at the game and I screamed no good and was asked, "what game are you watching!" I knew there was something to it when I got to the car and heard Norm talking about it on the post game!

 

[Wezsh0T]

man...I thought I was the only one that thought it was no good.

 

[Ganja]

Another thing that comes to mind, what about the flag for 12 players on the field? Troy and Buck counted the players twice on two different camera shots using the telestrator and both times there was no evidence of 12 players.

Anyone else notice the same?

 

[juck]

Another thing that comes to mind, what about the flag for 12 players on the field? Troy and Buck counted the players twice on two different camera shots using the telestrator and both times there was no evidence of 12 players.

Anyone else notice the same?

norm said there was 12.

 

[Beast_from_East]

What is wrong with the refs this year, first Denver and now this???

I just watched it again and I dont see how it was ruled good, has to be an optical illusion or that ref is neighbors with Danny Snyder!!!

 

[Ganja]

norm said there was 12.

OK, cool. Thanks for the clarification.

 

[lane]

I looked at the kick again and it looks like it was outside the goal post, it really does look no good.

However, the angle could be an optical illusion since the camera is positioned to the side and not directly behind the post.

Like others, I am not going to blame officiating for this loss. the fact that our D, loaded with 1st rounders and high-priced free agents, let the Skins drive the lenght of the field at the very end of the game is why we lost.

Translation: The defense blows, even if the ref screwed up the FG.

the defense definitely needs to be shored up starting with stewart being **** canned.

 

[juck]

If it was no good i would have to assume people would have made a stink,i think it was an illusion

 

[Beast_from_East]

Another thing that comes to mind, what about the flag for 12 players on the field? Troy and Buck counted the players twice on two different camera shots using the telestrator and both times there was no evidence of 12 players.

Anyone else notice the same?

The camera only showed 11 guys, I am guessing somebody tried to run off the field and didnt make it before the snap. You dont see him because he is suppossedly on the sideline barrier.

I thought Wade was going to challenge it myself, he had the red flag in his hand and he just stuck it back in his pocket.

They still probably make the kick, but they got to run a couple of more mins off the clock.

 

[BigWillie]

No - you can't.

Almost 100% sure you can. I think you just cannot challenge a ball that goes over either of the of the sides.

 

[CarlAllDay]

the defense definitely needs to be shored up starting with stewart being **** canned.

couldnt agree more should have just signed capers and sent him packing.

but it would have made too much sense i'll bet 2 weeks pay that next season garrett is the head coach and capers will be the coordinator i think jerry wanted him to get familiar with the players and other coaches

 

[Boyzmamacita]

OK, so I'm not crazy. I could've sworn that kick was no good. If they missed that one, wow, just wow. Was it the difference in the game? We will never know. That's the problem.

 

[Ganja]

The camera only showed 11 guys, I am guessing somebody tried to run off the field and didnt make it before the snap. You dont see him because he is suppossedly on the sideline barrier.

I thought Wade was going to challenge it myself, he had the red flag in his hand and he just stuck it back in his pocket.

They still probably make the kick, but they got to run a couple of more mins off the clock.

Yea, you're probably right about someone running off the field late, I was just stuck on Troy and Buck counting the players on those two particular camera shots. It's all good.

OTOH, I'm not so sure about Suisham making the kick had we not been penalized. It would've been about a 47 yarder...that's no gimme.