Erik_H in chat, went frame by frame and counted 12. Couldn't read the number tho. Said the player was at the 19 yard line. Somebody else also posted in chat that Watkins admitted he was the player.Beast_from_East;2293347 said:I only counted 11 on the screen so I am assuming somebody tried to run off the field late.
Norm says it was a good call, that there were in fact 12 guys on the feild. So if Norm says it was a legit call, that is good enough for me.
Don't think anyone is excusing anything. Most on here have given the Skins props for soundly beating the 'boys. It's called discussing the game.bbgun;2293368 said:Loser talk. It doesn't excuse 60 minutes of ineptitude and lackluster play.
WoodysGirl;2293383 said:Don't think anyone is excusing anything. Most on here have given the Skins props for soundly beating the 'boys. It's called discussing the game.
WoodysGirl;2293378 said:Erik_H in chat, went frame by frame and counted 12. Couldn't read the number tho. Said the player was at the 19 yard line. Somebody else also posted in chat that Watkins admitted he was the player.
Ben Roflsberger;2293339 said:http://www.nfl.com/videos?videoId=09000d5d80b30a50
its around 2:14
2 pages for me. The significance of it and the 12 player thing is that they were big plays in the game and they looked odd. Don't necessarily see a bunch of howling about the unfairness of it all. Multiple people thought the same thing. That makes it a discussion point.bbgun;2293405 said:This thread wouldn't be five pages long if certain people didn't think it was significant. The point is that it never should have come down to a missed Skins fg.
Hoofbite;2292939 said:You'll get more closure by hitting the "X" on this thread than you will from any video.
random Cs;2293550 said:Both referees signaled good without hesitation. Neither looked at the other for confirmation. That is generally a pretty good sign that the referees got the call correct.
You Cowboy fans have things to complain about after today but this particular case isn't worth the emotion.
I'm not sure, but I think it's only reviewable if the ball hits the crossbar.ninja;2293641 said:I thought after the Balt/Clev fiasco last year about the Fg, FGs were now reviewable?
I thought it was no good.
yentl911;2292981 said:Comlaining now isnlt going to change a thing and just make us look like a bunch of sore losers.
I did think the kick was wide but if the Skins would have missed it they would have changed their philosophy down the stretch and our D had no answere. Simple as that.
Hoofbite;2292928 said:Ill take what the 2 guys underneath the goal posts have to say.
Even with as crappy as the officiating has been, I cannot see any way in hell they would mess up a FG.
juckie;2293098 said:norm said there was 12.