Seven
Messenger to the football Gods
- Messages
- 19,301
- Reaction score
- 9,892
Family should put all that energy into finding their daughter & grandkid's killer.
They perpetrator(s) probably ain't rich..............
Family should put all that energy into finding their daughter & grandkid's killer.
If he had an alibi and is positive he is not the father, then he should do it and lay this to rest once and for all.
Well then they know who their unborn child's father was. It is what it is.
I don't have a problem with the family requesting another paternity test. I have a problem with the request not being kept confidential and strictly communicated between the respective attorneys.
If the child is dead, I don't get what this family is trying to do...
I preface this by saying I have know idea what this mother is going through and therefore will not dare question her motive for contemplating a second DNA test, although I understand why one would think its suspect....but here is my take:
If the second test proves Collins is STILL not the father, there is still no closure, with regard to her daughter's murder (and consequently, the death of the unborn child). If the second test shows that Collins IS indeed the father, but not the killer, is that complete closure? If I were her, and I'm not, I would not have closure until I found out who the hell killed my daughter, then have that person tested (if it's a male). Just my $0.02.
Only thing I can guess is that they want to eliminate a Rae Carruth angle in this.
how does him being the dad bring closure anyway since he didn't kill them?
if Collins had not already been cleared, I would understand that, but he has been so it makes no sense.
He hasn't been charged. The cops never officially cleared him. Big difference.
And, no, I don't think he did anything associated with the murder.
She said she wanted a test outside the state. Which means she doesn't trust the local police there. So reading between the lines she thinks he may be the father and had people paid off. And that someone killed her (them) for him. That's the only way I can interpret it.