True, but if true, it shows KM's lack of cajones. Hey, you were the O-Coordinator for several years. You should have had a huge input in which type of players you would have liked for your system. If you didn't speak up because of your young age and lack of experience at the position, that falls squarely on you and shows you weren't ready to be an O-Coordinator.
Not if he works for a follow the ball owner who thinks he knows more than the coaches. Booger has listened to his DC's before, remember Marinelli with Charleton and Hill?
I think Booger stays out of the D's way and spends all his fun time with the offensive side of it and his stars.
The value of Kellen Moore to the offense is really unknown unless you use stats and rankings. But his absence might be revealing and if McC really wants to run the ball more than Moore did, that could backfire.
And as I have noted before, this board faults coaching more than execution except when it comes to the QB. And he gets faulted for everything by some.
I also think Moore was frustrated because of the Joneses involvement with the offense regarding their 40M QB and 15M RB. The reason a relatively inexperienced OC was there in the first place was the same reason they hired Garrett, control.
The relationship between Moore and Prescott seemed to be a solid one, better than McC's relationship with his QB's in GB. Then again, the GM did use 1st round picks on QB's while they were still in the saddle so most of that might not have been his fault.
There is a long history of a chasm between GM's and coaches, Parcells and Young, Harbaugh and anybody else and I don't know how comfortable any coach, not a HC, is with voicing opinions about talent around the GM. Can't use the Cowboys as a template because it's run different than any sports franchise on the planet.