Romo 2 Austin;4579569 said:
I am not talking about the time that the NWA title - I am referring to the time period since TNA crowned their own title.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_TNA_World_Heavyweight_Champions
Lets compare it to the more prestigous of the two WWE titles -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_WWE_Champions
It has changed hands about another ten times.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_World_Heavyweight_Champions_(WWE)
about 12 more transfers.
So not only has the main event scene of each title been watered down more than the TNA scene as a whole but to fairly ***** the WWE main event scene you must combine the two titles for about an extra 40 title transfers. Only ignorant people would argue that the WWE main event scene is more prestigious than the TNA main event scene. In TNA the talents are built up for years before given a shot in a main event role, WWE decides that someone has the look and gives them the title when absolutely no one wants them to get it and then when the push fails they go "not our fault, the talent didnt get over" and they bury them for 3-4 years for absolutely no good reason once more.
LOL!
Yeah I'm just going to ignore the history of the belt that doesn't fit your argument.
Great plan there.
Ummmm....how about...no.
I will not ignore a large portion of that titles history because of a name change in order to make you feel better about a stupid comment.
Again it's very simple.
Punk, Cena, Orton, Sheamus, Jericho, Daniel, Del Rio > Roode, Angle, Bubba Ray, Storm, Hardy, and whoever else might be in the main event scene currently. I'd add in AJ but I'm not even sure if he's actually being pushed in the main event scene right now.
Outside of Roode, and a much improved Bubba Ray, I'm not at all interested in anything else in the top part of TNA.
And that includes Angle who I haven't found entertaining, mostly because of the way he's been booked/pushed, since they started the whole stupid angle with his Ex-Wife.
Romo 2 Austin;4579586 said:
Because they are facts and figures. People want to **** on my arguments event though they are statistically accurate. Guess they don't like facts or statistics.
Actual facts yes. The problem is that you bring personal opinion into what you are told are facts and not only do they hurt your figures but they make you sound more ignorant.