KingintheNorth
Chris in Arizona
- Messages
- 17,747
- Reaction score
- 24,483
Woods;3887240 said:Why not Watt at all?
sorry, don't want him at #9. To me, Watt is a low first round, early second round guy. Will be a good NFL player.
Woods;3887240 said:Why not Watt at all?
dbair1967;3887244 said:I dont know what tape your looking at then, because he's been pretty good at USC. And they run a pro style offense.
Chris in Arizona;3887235 said:Good catch sir.
I'm still on the Peterson bandwagon but if we can't get him then Smith at 9 (or a with a slight trade down) would be ideal.
I could live with another pass rusher (Quinn, Bowers) but only if there is a plan in place to trade Spencer.
I've soured on Prince and I do not want Watt at all.
Woods;3887240 said:Why not Watt at all?
MarionBarberThe4th;3887255 said:MY list at 9 is Peterson, Quinn, and Tyron. Ill throw Fairley in there 4th since its not impossible
B/C they drafted Spears in the 1st and he is what they thought he was. Yet they think very lowly of him and he wont be back. Why use a top 10 pick on a similar player tp Spears when youre hurting badly on the line and secondary?
Chris in Arizona;3887199 said:They listed him at 290 his last year but they admitted they were being generous. I think Al Groh was the coach at the time and he laughed in an interview when he was asked how did D 'Brick finally get up to 290 from the 265 he played at his Junior season. Ferguson had many of the same concerns right before his draft. They worried about him having to bulk up and could he stay and play at that weight.
He also stayed for his Senior season. He went 4th. Smith will go 10th through 15th. They have pretty similar stories.
TheFinisher;3887190 said:You highlighted what he came into college at as a freshman, Ferguson hovered around 295-300 as a Senior, plus he was on an entirely different level than Smith.
SDogo;3887254 said:He has been solid at USC while showing flashes of greatness but was exposed A LOT. Many times he looked like a 19 or 20 year old kid who needed to add some weight and needed more time on the field. The NFL is not the Pac10 and Tyron Smith is no where near NFL ready.
Your fooling yourself if your thinking any team out there is drafting this kid looking to plug him into the starting lineup today. It's not exactly a national secret that teams are concerned about how raw he is but that's also what attracts them.
Your putting WAY too much stock into this kids future potential paying off immediately.
realtick;3887270 said:Dude, you're so full of crap on this issue, lol.
Ferguson played at 295 lb his Senior year, he weighed 312 at the combine. That's a 17 pound difference.
Can you name the other OT taken in the 1st round of the 2006 Draft with Ferguson?
Let me help you....there was no other OT taken in the 1st round.
Ferguson benifitted from being in a weak OT class, he ended up being taken no. 4 overall. Do you think the Jets are "rueing" that decision?
It was a more extreme situation that what Smith is in now. This is a relatively weak OT class. If Smith can be D'Brick for the next 10 years, I won't have any complaints taking him at #9.
realtick;3887293 said:Jerry Jones draft philosophy for as long as I can remember it has always, always, always been that his 1st round picks are expected to be early contributors.
I see no reason why the Cowboys would depart from that philosophy. Marc Colombo is coming off a bad season and is another year older. Not to mention, cutting him would save the team money (IIRC).
TheFinisher;3887297 said:This totally contradicts your support for Smith, he's extremely raw and most likely will be nothing more than a swing tackle as a rookie. Thanks for playing.
realtick;3887300 said:It doesn't contradict it all bonehead.
My contention is that if he's drafted by the Cowboys, he'll start barring injury.
Now go back to surfing YouTube for highlights.
dbair1967;3887283 said:Who exposed him? I saw clips from one game where he had a few struggles, though that was a game his first yr as a starter against a very complex 3-4 defensive team. team
TheFinisher;3887314 said::laugh2:
You're right, just because he's our 1st round pick means Garrett will have no other choice but to start him, even if he's a year removed from being ready.
please keep going, I'm enjoying your insight.
realtick;3887326 said:Lol, you're reaching at this point.
Your entire knowledge base regarding Smith consists of a five-minute clip found on YouTube.
Please keep posting though, I thoroughly enjoy your incessant whining....
"...well, I'm not impressed....buh, buh, but how come I don't see him pancaking anyone...buh Dug Phreee izzz our startin' LT!"
silverbear;3887373 said:I'm just not high on Tyron, because I like my offensive linemen BIG, STRONG and NASTY... so I'm not saying he won't be a good pro, but he is what I call a "finesse" linemen...
I know, a lot of teams these days are going toward smaller, quicker offensive lines, but IMO there are blockers in the draft who are bigger, but still plenty quick... IOW, I don't want some 350 pounder who you could time in the 40 using a sundial... gimme some more of what Hudson Houck likes, those "big butts", just pick through and find the ones with some quickness...
In this draft, my favorite first round OL prospect is Carimi, who IMO fits the profile that I'm looking for... I also like Marcus Cannon a lot, for the same reason (in the 2nd round, not the 1st)... and I don't care at all for Nate Solder, since most scouts seem to think he's best suited to a zone blocking scheme...
RS12;3887377 said:Sturm in Q/A today was a proponent of taking him at 9, said he thought he was low risk FWIW.