Call your shot

darthseinfeld · Apr 25, 2017

With the draft a couple days away, how do you see it going down?

darthseinfeld · Apr 25, 2017

I see it being between Adoree and Watt most likely. I think they have a preference for pass rushers I think they go Watt and draft Tankersley in the 2nd.

I could see Jackson at 28 with McKinley at 60 as well. Takk could be a big faller if he may start on PUP

Killerinstinct · Apr 25, 2017

1. Adoree Jackson CB
2. Markus Maye S
3. Cordrea Tankersley CB
4. Dawuane Smoot DE

darthseinfeld · Apr 25, 2017

Killerinstinct said:
1. Adoree Jackson CB
2. Markus Maye S
3. Cordrea Tankersley CB
4. Dawuane Smoot DE

Smoot could be a real steal

Teague31 · Apr 25, 2017

McDowell or McKinley. If both gone then Adoree

Dallas_Cowboys50 · Apr 25, 2017

Im guessing (and hoping) we dont even pick on Thursday....

Idgit · Apr 25, 2017

Have a hard time nailing down who I think they like at DE here. If the DE isn't there, I think the pick is Adoree Jackson, but I imagine they'd prefer to get the DL first and the CB later.

Of the DEs, I think they're probably looking at Watt or Harris. Barnett won't be there, but they'd jump on him if he were. I don't know why I don't think they like Taco as much as he projected to go to us quite a bit, but I don't.

The other option is a small trade down, where Bowser or McDowell come into play. Then the other CBs. Bowser I knock slightly because he didn't go to a bigger program. McDowell has his challenges. They tend to stick to the safest bets in the first round these days.

darthseinfeld · Apr 25, 2017

Idgit said:
Have a hard time nailing down who I think they like at DE here. If the DE isn't there, I think the pick is Adoree Jackson, but I imagine they'd prefer to get the DL first and the CB later.

Of the DEs, I think they're probably looking at Watt or Harris. Barnett won't be there, but they'd jump on him if he were. I don't know why I don't think they like Taco as much as he projected to go to us quite a bit, but I don't.

The other option is a small trade down, where Bowser or McDowell come into play. Then the other CBs. Bowser I knock slightly because he didn't go to a bigger program. McDowell has his challenges. They tend to stick to the safest bets in the first round these days.

Absolutely nothing concrete since it hasnt come from the club, but the Draft Show guys dont think Barnett is a RDE fit here.

Maybe be somewhat valid, but there is interest enough from the club for him to be a 30

Tristan · Apr 25, 2017

Killerinstinct said:
1. Adoree Jackson CB
2. Markus Maye S
3. Cordrea Tankersley CB
4. Dawuane Smoot DE

Noice!

Idgit · Apr 25, 2017

darthseinfeld said:
Absolutely nothing concrete since it hasnt come from the club, but the Draft Show guys dont think Barnett is a RDE fit here.

Maybe be somewhat valid, but there is interest enough from the club for him to be a 30

I don't see it. It won't matter, though, since he'll go in the top half of the round.

darthseinfeld · Apr 25, 2017

Idgit said:
Have a hard time nailing down who I think they like at DE here. If the DE isn't there, I think the pick is Adoree Jackson, but I imagine they'd prefer to get the DL first and the CB later.

Of the DEs, I think they're probably looking at Watt or Harris. Barnett won't be there, but they'd jump on him if he were. I don't know why I don't think they like Taco as much as he projected to go to us quite a bit, but I don't.

The other option is a small trade down, where Bowser or McDowell come into play. Then the other CBs. Bowser I knock slightly because he didn't go to a bigger program. McDowell has his challenges. They tend to stick to the safest bets in the first round these days.

McDowell is a real option at 28 IMO. Top 10, maybe even 5 talent but will slip. Dont think if they pass on that talent level at 28.

Like Gregory in 2015 he was a late visit. Could be like Gregory they didnt think they had a chance

skinsscalper · Apr 25, 2017

Watt in the 1st. After that it's a crapshoot (as is Watt in the 1st but that's my call) .

Hardline · Apr 25, 2017

Not a fan of Jackson but I'll take him over Peppers.

I have a gut feeling Takk is the man.

Alexander · Apr 25, 2017

Dallas_Cowboys50 said:
Im guessing (and hoping) we dont even pick on Thursday....

If things are going to go down like they appear to be, like choosing Adoree Jackson at 28, trading out of the round would be like a divine gift to me.

darthseinfeld · Apr 25, 2017

Hardline said:
Not a fan of Jackson but I'll take him over Peppers.

I have a gut feeling Takk is the man.

Had that feeling too, but talk is they he will be on PUP.

If thats true, Takk could slip to 60

jamesdojr · Apr 25, 2017

darthseinfeld said:
I see it being between Adoree and Watt most likely. I think they have a preference for pass rushers I think they go Watt and draft Tankersley in the 2nd.

I could see Jackson at 28 with McKinley at 60 as well. Takk could be a big faller if he may start on PUP

Man, Watt and Tankersley would be pretty sweet.

cds99 · Apr 25, 2017

Adoree at 28 I could see happening.

Alexander · Apr 25, 2017

darthseinfeld said:
Absolutely nothing concrete since it hasnt come from the club, but the Draft Show guys dont think Barnett is a RDE fit here.

I absolutely hate, hate, hate that we can seemingly disqualify good players because they don't "fit" our scheme. It would be one thing if that scheme was tried and true and won a lot of football games. But that is not the case. It just comes across as stubborn and shiftless. It is not the same as taking talent, figuring out what they do best and then capitalizing on it. We look for prototypes and look for the right size peg to fit the hole. Sometimes the problem might be the hole to begin with.

Hardline · Apr 25, 2017

Alexander said:
I absolutely hate, hate, hate that we can seemingly disqualify good players because they don't "fit" our scheme. It would be one thing if that scheme was tried and true and won a lot of football games. But that is not the case. It just comes across as stubborn and shiftless. It is not the same as taking talent, figuring out what they do best and then capitalizing on it. We look for prototypes and look for the right size peg to fit the hole. Sometimes the problem might be the hole to begin with.

Do you have Jason Garrett's phone number or email address?
He needs to hear this.

darthseinfeld · Apr 25, 2017

Alexander said:
I absolutely hate, hate, hate that we can seemingly disqualify good players because they don't "fit" our scheme. It would be one thing if that scheme was tried and true and won a lot of football games. But that is not the case. It just comes across as stubborn and shiftless. It is not the same as taking talent, figuring out what they do best and then capitalizing on it. We look for prototypes and look for the right size peg to fit the hole. Sometimes the problem might be the hole to begin with.

Thats the downside of a scheme thats needs scheme fits. Where the upside is you may get value on players late, some very talented players early wont fit

Call your shot

Groupthink Guru

Groupthink Guru

Well-Known Member

Groupthink Guru

Defender of the Star

Well-Known Member

Fattening up

Groupthink Guru

Well-Known Member

Fattening up

Groupthink Guru

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

What's it going to be then, eh?

Groupthink Guru

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

What's it going to be then, eh?

Well-Known Member

Groupthink Guru