Call your shot

I see it being between Adoree and Watt most likely. I think they have a preference for pass rushers I think they go Watt and draft Tankersley in the 2nd.

I could see Jackson at 28 with McKinley at 60 as well. Takk could be a big faller if he may start on PUP
 
Have a hard time nailing down who I think they like at DE here. If the DE isn't there, I think the pick is Adoree Jackson, but I imagine they'd prefer to get the DL first and the CB later.

Of the DEs, I think they're probably looking at Watt or Harris. Barnett won't be there, but they'd jump on him if he were. I don't know why I don't think they like Taco as much as he projected to go to us quite a bit, but I don't.

The other option is a small trade down, where Bowser or McDowell come into play. Then the other CBs. Bowser I knock slightly because he didn't go to a bigger program. McDowell has his challenges. They tend to stick to the safest bets in the first round these days.
 
Idgit said:
Have a hard time nailing down who I think they like at DE here. If the DE isn't there, I think the pick is Adoree Jackson, but I imagine they'd prefer to get the DL first and the CB later.

Of the DEs, I think they're probably looking at Watt or Harris. Barnett won't be there, but they'd jump on him if he were. I don't know why I don't think they like Taco as much as he projected to go to us quite a bit, but I don't.

The other option is a small trade down, where Bowser or McDowell come into play. Then the other CBs. Bowser I knock slightly because he didn't go to a bigger program. McDowell has his challenges. They tend to stick to the safest bets in the first round these days.
Click to expand...
Absolutely nothing concrete since it hasnt come from the club, but the Draft Show guys dont think Barnett is a RDE fit here.

Maybe be somewhat valid, but there is interest enough from the club for him to be a 30
 
darthseinfeld said:
Absolutely nothing concrete since it hasnt come from the club, but the Draft Show guys dont think Barnett is a RDE fit here.

Maybe be somewhat valid, but there is interest enough from the club for him to be a 30
Click to expand...

I don't see it. It won't matter, though, since he'll go in the top half of the round.
 
Idgit said:
Have a hard time nailing down who I think they like at DE here. If the DE isn't there, I think the pick is Adoree Jackson, but I imagine they'd prefer to get the DL first and the CB later.

Of the DEs, I think they're probably looking at Watt or Harris. Barnett won't be there, but they'd jump on him if he were. I don't know why I don't think they like Taco as much as he projected to go to us quite a bit, but I don't.

The other option is a small trade down, where Bowser or McDowell come into play. Then the other CBs. Bowser I knock slightly because he didn't go to a bigger program. McDowell has his challenges. They tend to stick to the safest bets in the first round these days.
Click to expand...
McDowell is a real option at 28 IMO. Top 10, maybe even 5 talent but will slip. Dont think if they pass on that talent level at 28.

Like Gregory in 2015 he was a late visit. Could be like Gregory they didnt think they had a chance
 
Watt in the 1st. After that it's a crapshoot (as is Watt in the 1st but that's my call) .
 
darthseinfeld said:
I see it being between Adoree and Watt most likely. I think they have a preference for pass rushers I think they go Watt and draft Tankersley in the 2nd.

I could see Jackson at 28 with McKinley at 60 as well. Takk could be a big faller if he may start on PUP
Click to expand...

Man, Watt and Tankersley would be pretty sweet.
 
darthseinfeld said:
Absolutely nothing concrete since it hasnt come from the club, but the Draft Show guys dont think Barnett is a RDE fit here.
Click to expand...

I absolutely hate, hate, hate that we can seemingly disqualify good players because they don't "fit" our scheme. It would be one thing if that scheme was tried and true and won a lot of football games. But that is not the case. It just comes across as stubborn and shiftless. It is not the same as taking talent, figuring out what they do best and then capitalizing on it. We look for prototypes and look for the right size peg to fit the hole. Sometimes the problem might be the hole to begin with.
 
Alexander said:
I absolutely hate, hate, hate that we can seemingly disqualify good players because they don't "fit" our scheme. It would be one thing if that scheme was tried and true and won a lot of football games. But that is not the case. It just comes across as stubborn and shiftless. It is not the same as taking talent, figuring out what they do best and then capitalizing on it. We look for prototypes and look for the right size peg to fit the hole. Sometimes the problem might be the hole to begin with.
Click to expand...
Do you have Jason Garrett's phone number or email address?
He needs to hear this.
 
Alexander said:
I absolutely hate, hate, hate that we can seemingly disqualify good players because they don't "fit" our scheme. It would be one thing if that scheme was tried and true and won a lot of football games. But that is not the case. It just comes across as stubborn and shiftless. It is not the same as taking talent, figuring out what they do best and then capitalizing on it. We look for prototypes and look for the right size peg to fit the hole. Sometimes the problem might be the hole to begin with.
Click to expand...
Thats the downside of a scheme thats needs scheme fits. Where the upside is you may get value on players late, some very talented players early wont fit
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Members online

Total: 6,897 (members: 58, guests: 6,839)
Robots: 1,192

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
474,003
Messages
14,505,769
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top