Calling all Olgetree fans

[jobberone]

He passes the eyeball test. He has a talent at WR. Now it's just a matter of time to get more snaps. And then he has to continue to make the most of them.

One of the greatest WRs to ever play this game ran precise routes and was where he was supposed to be when he was supposed to be. His name is Raymond Berry. Ogletree is much quicker and faster then Berry ever was. Not saying he will be the next Raymond Berry but I think he has a great amount of potential.

And I say that from playing ball and then watching it for the last 50 years.

And I agree with the essence of Eskimos' list.

 

[Eskimo]

All that the vast majority of Ogletree fans want to see is him get more snaps and become a bigger part of the game plan. We don't expect him to start because he still has to go through Crayton and RW on the depth chart. I just don't think RW can assume he can just keep going out there and screwing things up. At some point, the snaps will start going to other players who are hungry and want to play. I think we have reached that point.

Let the boy play - he wants it and he deserves it.

 

[JustDezIt]

SuperOnyx _ what the hell was the point of this thread? cause you saw a couple *******es say he should start when they really meant play more? You are arguing over the words start and play more. And you have been sonned reapeatedly in this thread, and you pick and choose which comments to respond to. You are not helping this site, at all.

Low catch count = Low playing time(orig. Sixth String) See miles pre Kc
Low college stats = Garbage Quaterback/bad system (See Our most Dominant Defensive player not named Ware)
High Combine Stats = Steal
Everytime we have needed a play from him = Catch

But i know you already know all this because you read them too and still want to stick on the thought of him starting. I feel dumber after reading your constant questioning and inability to realize that you might infact be wrong on this issue. Im sorry i bumped this but you frustrated me enough over 9 pages that i had to atleast respond. Go back into whatever hole you have been hiding in since 2005, *****.


Whats the worst that could happen anyways? He performs or back to the bench for him. What you dont want to see a wide reciever for the cowboys be successful or show glimpses of potential that could be here for a long time?
Guess you rather see RW drop it in critical situations, or go to hurd twice in denver with the game on the line? Should i mention Crayton?
Of course hurd has done more, he been on the team longer genius.

Get over it *****

EDIT-2004

 

[Bob Sacamano]

you don't need to see hundreds of snaps to know if a receiver has great body control, very good hands etc. etc.

 

[JustDezIt]

you don't need to see hundreds of snaps to know if a receiver has great body control, very good hands etc. etc.

There's no point in saying it, he has made up his mind that Ogletree should start. No wait a second, lemme go back and read again to make sure i got that right.....

 

[FuzzyLumpkins]

lol, is this some kind of sarcastic joke? If so brilliant.

These are all the same things people said about Austin.

No, it was all about Austin can't hold onto the football.

 

[dmq]

You know we love our team when we start a love thread about a guy that has 6 receptions this season. Honestly, I like the guy too. I hope he can be the Steve Smith of our offense.

 

[Rudy]

Calvin Johnson would have had weak numbers too if he had gone to UVA when Ogletree did. Horrible offense. He was the lone bright spot.